I noticed it in task manager, that the system became more sluggish the
longer I let it run. Then in task manager I saw that jaws was adding a
few kb memory usage every few seconds even though I wasn't doing
anything that seemed like it should take more memory like that.
This was running with a display capable of 2560x1600, the issue did
not take long to show up.
On 7/31/15, Geoff Chapman <gch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ah. ok. but, my question is, how did you guys twig to this/work that out?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Mauck" <don.mauck@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jawsscripts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2015 9:38 AM
Subject: [jawsscripts] Re: Resolutions supported by JAWS
I do recall that was a big issue in JAWS12.
-----Original Message-----
From: Geoff Chapman [mailto:gch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 5:28 PM
To: jawsscripts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jawsscripts] Re: Resolutions supported by JAWS
Oooo! Really Soronel? eeeeek! how did you find that out? Memory leaks
are
not all that obvious are they?
I only have 12 on my new laptop. I wonder what symptoms one might want to
look out for, that memory leaks are occurring?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Soronel Haetir" <soronel.haetir@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <jawsscripts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2015 2:39 AM
Subject: [jawsscripts] Re: Resolutions supported by JAWS
1920x1080 works fine for me (at least with jfw16 and before that
jfw15). What is not supported well is using DPI scaling (the make text
appear larger setting).
If you use resolution dependent features like jaws frames then you
will likely have problems if you change the resolution (even if the
resolution only changes because you move configuration files between
systems running at different resolutions). But even with such features
if you do not change the resolution you should be fine.
I do recall with older jaws versions (12 or so IIRC) there were
problems running at anything above 1600x1200. If memory serves the
problems were jaws memory leaks rather than not actually being able to
deal with the screen at that size.
On 7/31/15, Octavian Rasnita <orasnita@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
My laptop supports the resolutions below and it keeps telling me that
the
optimal resolution is 1920x1080.
Do you know if it is supported well by JAWS or I should choose a lower
resolution? And if I need to set a lower resolution, how low it needs
to
be?
I have seen that under Windows 7, unlike under Win XP, if I route JAWS
cursor to PC cursor and read immediately with Insert+PageUp, JAWS reads
more
than it should, which is a sign that the mouse cursor was not placed
immediately where it should. But if I let it for a few seconds and I
read
with Insert+PageUp, it reads OK.
I thought that JAWS may be confused by the resolution, but I am not
sure.
The resolutions I can use are:
1920x1080
1600x900
1280x720
1024x768
--Octavian
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts
--
Soronel Haetir
soronel.haetir@xxxxxxxxx
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts
__________�
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts
__________�
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts
