In article <4eb9a31f41alan_calder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Calder <alan_calder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In article <4eb99f95e2tim@xxxxxxxxx>, Tim Hill <tim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In article <4eb99c9306charles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, charles > > <charles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [Snip] > > > Not everyone lives in a town. In many rural areas some phone > > > subscribers are too far from the exchange to get a broadband > > > service. > > Even here, on the edge of a town, two crow miles from the exchange > > with underground (poor) cables, Max broadband is currently 'only' > > 3328k which I think is a bit faster than dial-up IIRC. > Real frontier stuff where you live! Hardly. [Snip] > There are places considerably more remote than yours. Really? You think? ;-) Perhaps the implication you missed was: "even here on the edge of a town relatively close to the exchange but with dirty lines, Max broadband isn't anywhere near 8Mb/s so if you live in the wilds, you have little chance. However for me, 3,300 is a much bigger number than 56, even if it isn't 8,000" In fact, I have checked and the exchange is only 1.7 miles by road. I don't know the route the BT cables take but it's unlikely to be under 3 km. That's a lot of copper. I sure there are plenty of urban areas which are about 3km or less by wire from their exchange; you don't have to live in the middle of Dartmoor to have issues with broadband reception, even where it should be okay. Enough, already. This is iyonix-support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Tim Hill, www.timil.com --- To alter your preferences or leave the group, visit //www.freelists.org/list/iyonix-support Other info via //www.freelists.org/webpage/iyonix-support