[isapros] Re: Anyone Speak Linksys?
- From: "John T \(Lists\)" <johnlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:18:13 -0800
Yes, simple little desktop 8 port gigabit switches. I have put 8 of them in
and 5 have failed.
John T
eServices For You
"Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood."
Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf
> Of Thomas W Shinder
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 7:33 PM
> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [isapros] Re: Anyone Speak Linksys?
>
> Even their dumb switches fail since Syphco. I told you they were the
> "Moron Empire" or at least something like that.
>
> Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
> Site: www.isaserver.org
> Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder
> Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7
> MVP -- ISA Firewalls
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John T (Lists)
> > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 8:09 PM
> > To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [isapros] Re: Anyone Speak Linksys?
> >
> > The only Linksys I speak anymore (post Cisco) is barf. 50% of
> > the devices I
> > have purchased for clients post Cisco takeover have failed.
> > (And nearly
> > every device less than 5-6 years old but before Cisco got
> > there hands on it
> > are still in service, even old firmware/model versions of the
> > same device
> > that now new has a 50% or more failure rate.)
> >
> > John T
> > eServices For You
> >
> > "Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be
> > understood."
> > Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882)
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf
> > > Of Amy Babinchak
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 4:54 PM
> > > To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [isapros] Anyone Speak Linksys?
> > >
> > > I've got this in my VPN log on the Linksys end of a ISA
> > 2004 to Linksys
> > > site-to-site VPN connection. The tunnel claims to be
> > connected but I'm
> > > having trouble sending data through it. Here's the log on
> > the Linksys
> > > side.
> > >
> > > Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log received Delete SA
> > payload: deleting
> > > ISAKMP State #127
> > > Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Received Vendor ID
> > payload Type =
> > > [MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY 00000004]
> > > Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Ignoring Vendor ID
> > payload Type =
> > > [FRAGMENTATION]
> > > Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Received Vendor ID
> > payload Type =
> > > [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n]
> > > Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<<
> > > Responder Received Main Mode 1st packet
> > > Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
> > > Responder Send Main Mode 2nd packet
> > > Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Initiating Main Mode
> > > Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
> > > Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
> > > Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Received Vendor ID
> > payload Type =
> > > [MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY 00000004]
> > > Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Ignoring Vendor ID
> > payload Type =
> > > [FRAGMENTATION]
> > > Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Received Vendor ID
> > payload Type =
> > > [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n]
> > > Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<<
> > > Initiator Received Main Mode 2nd packet
> > > Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
> > > Initiator send Main Mode 3rd packet
> > > Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Phase 1 message is part of an
> > > unknown exchange
> > > Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<<
> > > Initiator Received Main Mode 4th packet
> > > Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
> > > Initiator Send Main Mode 5th packet
> > > Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
> > > Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet
> > > Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log Main mode peer ID is
> > ID_IPV4_ADDR:
> > > '72.158.241.2'
> > > Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation
> > Info] Main Mode
> > > Phase 1 SA Established
> > > Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation
> > Info] Initiator
> > > Cookies = 8829 f0cf 9dc2 73e1
> > > Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation
> > Info] Responder
> > > Cookies = 5bc7 46b1 dc42 b7d4
> > > Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log initiating Quick Mode
> > PSK+TUNNEL+PFS
> > >
> > > Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
> > > Initiator send Quick Mode 1st packet
> > > Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log IKE message has the
> > Commit Flag set
> > > but Pluto doesn't implement this feature; ignoring flag
> > > Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<<
> > > Initiator Received Quick Mode 2nd packet
> > > Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation
> > Info] Inbound
> > > SPI value = 617c35a1
> > > Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation
> > Info] Outbound
> > > SPI value = 9faea60d
> > > Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
> > > Initiator Send Quick Mode 3rd packet
> > > Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation
> > Info] Quick Mode
> > > Phase 2 SA Established, IPSec Tunnel Connected
> > > Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log Phase 1 message is part of an
> > > unknown exchange
> > > Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log IKE message has the
> > Commit Flag set
> > > but Pluto doesn't implement this feature; ignoring flag
> > > Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log message ignored because
> > it contains
> > > an payload type (ISAKMP_NEXT_HASH) unexpected in this message
> > > Dec 14 18:37:41 2006 VPN Log Phase 1 message is part of an
> > > unknown exchange
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Amy Babinchak
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Other related posts:
