[isapros] Re: Anyone Speak Linksys?

  • From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:29:25 -0800

Isn't that the sound your head makes when you tilt it back and forth?  :-p

t


On 12/15/06 9:18 AM, "Steve Moffat" <steve@xxxxxxxxxx> spoketh to all:

> Dlink.....Dlink....Dlink.....
> 
> Or buy professional equipment.....:)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Amy Babinchak
> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 9:29 AM
> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [isapros] Re: Anyone Speak Linksys?
> 
> NetGear is the one brand that I've never been able to get to work. We've
> always chosen Linksys for the micro branch offices. Which NetGear model
> works for you? When I tried them we got wireless or VPN client access
> out of them but not both at the same time. NetGear said it was a known
> issue and they didn't have solution at the time.
> 
> Amy Babinchak
> Harbor Computer Services
>  
> 248-546-6056 Office
> 248-890-1794 Mobile
>  
> ISA: http://isainsbs.blogspot.com
> for Clients: http://smalltechnotes.blogspot.com
> Website: http://www.harborcomputerservices.net
>  
>     
>  
>  
>  
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of John T (Lists)
> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 1:19 AM
> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [isapros] Re: Anyone Speak Linksys?
> 
> I choose Netgear. Seriously.
> 
> John T
> eServices For You
> 
> "Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood."
> Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882)
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf
>> Of Amy Babinchak
>> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 9:07 PM
>> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [isapros] Re: Anyone Speak Linksys?
>> 
>> DLink? Seriously?
>> 
>> Amy Babinchak
>> 
>> Harbor Computer Services
>> (248) 546-6056 office
>> (248) 890-1794 mobile
>> 
>> http://isainsbs.blogspot.com
>> http://www.harborcomputerservices.net
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf
>> Of Steve Moffat
>> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 8:14 PM
>> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [isapros] Re: Anyone Speak Linksys?
>> 
>> Lose the Linksys, get a Dlink....:P
>> 
>> They work.
>> 
>> S
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> On Behalf Of Amy Babinchak
>> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 8:54 PM
>> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [isapros] Anyone Speak Linksys?
>> 
>> I've got this in my VPN log on the Linksys end of a ISA 2004 to
> Linksys
>> site-to-site VPN connection. The tunnel claims to be connected but I'm
>> having trouble sending data through it. Here's the log on the Linksys
>> side.
>> 
>> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006     VPN Log    received Delete SA payload:
> deleting
>> ISAKMP State #127
>> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006     VPN Log    Received Vendor ID payload Type =
>> [MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY 00000004]
>> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006     VPN Log    Ignoring Vendor ID payload Type =
>> [FRAGMENTATION]
>> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006     VPN Log    Received Vendor ID payload Type =
>> [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n]
>> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006     VPN Log    [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<<
>> Responder Received Main Mode 1st packet
>> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006     VPN Log    [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
>> Responder Send Main Mode 2nd packet
>> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006     VPN Log    Initiating Main Mode
>> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006     VPN Log    [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
>> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006     VPN Log    Received Vendor ID payload Type =
>> [MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY 00000004]
>> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006     VPN Log    Ignoring Vendor ID payload Type =
>> [FRAGMENTATION]
>> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006     VPN Log    Received Vendor ID payload Type =
>> [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n]
>> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006     VPN Log    [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<<
>> Initiator Received Main Mode 2nd packet
>> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006     VPN Log    [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
>> Initiator send Main Mode 3rd packet
>> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006     VPN Log    Phase 1 message is part of an
>> unknown exchange
>> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006     VPN Log    [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<<
>> Initiator Received Main Mode 4th packet
>> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006     VPN Log    [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
>> Initiator Send Main Mode 5th packet
>> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006     VPN Log    [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
>> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet
>> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006     VPN Log    Main mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR:
>> '72.158.241.2'
>> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006     VPN Log    [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Main
> Mode
>> Phase 1 SA Established
>> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006     VPN Log    [Tunnel Negotiation Info]
> Initiator
>> Cookies = 8829 f0cf 9dc2 73e1
>> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006     VPN Log    [Tunnel Negotiation Info]
> Responder
>> Cookies = 5bc7 46b1 dc42 b7d4
>> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006     VPN Log    initiating Quick Mode
> PSK+TUNNEL+PFS
>> 
>> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006     VPN Log    [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
>> Initiator send Quick Mode 1st packet
>> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006     VPN Log    IKE message has the Commit Flag
> set
>> but Pluto doesn't implement this feature; ignoring flag
>> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006     VPN Log    [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<<
>> Initiator Received Quick Mode 2nd packet
>> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006     VPN Log    [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Inbound
>> SPI value = 617c35a1
>> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006     VPN Log    [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Outbound
>> SPI value = 9faea60d
>> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006     VPN Log    [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
>> Initiator Send Quick Mode 3rd packet
>> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006     VPN Log    [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Quick
> Mode
>> Phase 2 SA Established, IPSec Tunnel Connected
>> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006     VPN Log    Phase 1 message is part of an
>> unknown exchange
>> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006     VPN Log    IKE message has the Commit Flag
> set
>> but Pluto doesn't implement this feature; ignoring flag
>> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006     VPN Log    message ignored because it
> contains
>> an payload type (ISAKMP_NEXT_HASH) unexpected in this message
>> Dec 14 18:37:41 2006     VPN Log    Phase 1 message is part of an
>> unknown exchange
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Amy Babinchak
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



Other related posts: