Re: Access More Slowly than before
- From: "Amos" <amos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 23:07:08 -0700
Thx for your advice, Steve.
yes, i use some acl's but not much.
i use get user authorization from another machine (NT4 server) that trust
with ISA Server (W2000 server). is there effect with this case? any
suggestion again?
A M O S
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Evans" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <amos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: [isalist] Access More Slowly than before
> try upgrading the isa hardware to something really beefy and try again. $10
> says it'll be abit faster.
>
> otherwise remove un-needed acl's. or install a linux squid box and dont
> worry about it.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Amos [mailto:amos@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 27 February 2002 3:14 PM
> > To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
> > Subject: [isalist] Access More Slowly than before
> >
> >
> > http://www.ISAserver.org
> >
> >
> > I used proxy server 2.0 and ISA server in the different machine. I
> > installed proxy server 2.0 in NT 4.0 server and installed ISA
> > Server in
> > W2000 Server. our members who use each system are 150 people.
> > i compare
> > between proxy server 2.0 and ISA Server, but i wonder the ISA
> > Server more
> > slowly and proxy server 2.0 fast when i use access some site
> > (i compare
> > with the same site between isa server and proxy server 2.0).
> > and i read
> > about isa server, did i have a mistake when i set isa server
> > configuration?
> > both of the system use access policy for each groups.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------
> > You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion
> > List as: steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> > $subst('Email.Unsub')
> >
>
Other related posts:
