[interfacekit] Re: BClipboard

>
>Hey guys, we have a working clipboard.  I had to fix a few more things 
>than I anticipated during my system problems, but it now passes all of 
>its tests.  The same can't be said for the R5 implementation.  5 of my 
>test cases would crash in R5 if I didn't use the TEST_R5 stuff.  The 
>first case for the LocalCount function only passes some of the time (it 
>read unitialized memory).  In the event that somebody passes a NULL 
>pointer to the constructor, my implementation attaches to the system 
>clipboard rather than blowing up in your face like R5.  I suppose I 
>should document that behavior, but I am not sure that I want to 
>encourage people to attach to the system clipboard that way.
Nice work. Reminds me of how it seems we're making a better BeOS than BeOS.

--DW

Other related posts: