[Ilugc] why GNU should not be added to linux [was] Google drops Windows in their workplace
- From: narendra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (narendra sisodiya)
- Date: Sat Jun 5 01:17:54 2010
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Arun SAG <sagarun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
yet I am still to see one post or person on this list in any way either
trying
to understand linus's viewpoint or propagate it. Why?
So sweet! Now he got one :P
> Anyway, RMS summarises his views in this article:
> http://www.gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html
[snip]
<http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc>
Tell me, What if there is no GNU, No RMS ? No Linux right?
basically if 15 % belongs to GNU, then we must say GNU rather then following
to 1.5%
If GNU is not eligible term in your POV then Linux is also not a eligible
term.
better always use like
Fedora is a GNU/Linux based Operating System.
'Linux Operating System' is a confusing term and must be avoided.
--
???????????????????????????
? Narendra Sisodiya
?
http://narendrasisodiya.com
???????????????????????????
Other related posts:
