[Ilugc] Network services
- From: karthik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Karthik M)
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:45:10 +0530
On Wednesday 11 Feb 2004 11:17 am, Senthil Velan wrote:
We have a seperate server for our Local mail system. We are using sendamail
with redhat 8.0 for that. we have problem in network services. after a
certain hours all the network services gets automatically shutdown. we
don't why it is happening?
What does your logs say? Does *all* network services stop or just sendmail?
--
Karthik M
System Administrator - Infrastructure Team
SIP Technologies & Exports Limited,
G4, Elnet Software City, CPT Road,
Taramani, Chennai 600 113,
INDIA.
Phone: +91-44-22541401
+91-44-22541031
Fax: ÃÂ +91-44-22541475
Website:
http://www.siptech.com
.
From Sajith T S <sajithts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Wed Feb 11 06:25:57 2004
From: Sajith T S <sajithts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Sajith T S)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:55:57 +0530
Subject: [Ilugc] Company Discalimer & posting from company ID
In-Reply-To: <OF18E5330A.3388746A-ON65256E37.00142922@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <OF18E5330A.3388746A-ON65256E37.00142922@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <4029CAF5.2070904@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Ram Prakash wrote:
Why can't there be a link to an email-disclaimer page where all the crap
can be read?
And it would be a huge relief to just send just the link to that page sent
in the e-mails.
Like, we can have some thing like
"EMAIL DISCLAIMER: http://www.some-company.com/email-disclaimer.html";
attached at the end of every mail.
Saves bandwidth. Serves the same purpose(if any). Ppl won't get
annoyed/irritated.
Maybe sensible people in these organisations will do that someday. But
I guess the disclaimers sticked to the emails are beyond the control of
most employess - that often is a matter of company policy.
What really matters is that people want to participate in the community.
We should be encouraging them no matter what their emails look like, and
there must be a better way to look at all this. No email discriminations
please :)
Why can't we just live with somebody else's email disclaimer? I mean,
the bandwidth used/wasted over this was many times over that the poor
disclaimer themself. This topic isn't worthy of a flamewar, IMO.
Regards,
Sajith.
--
sigs waste bandwidth.
Other related posts:
