[PCB_FORUM] Re: hopefully question isn't silly
- From: sjchar3@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:13:04 -0400
I'm not sure why what to enter because the copper doesn't have dielectric
constant but there is a spot for it. The readme file says the Er of the
soldermask. I think i'm entering the right information. Thanks Mike.?
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike DeVita <mdevi@xxxxxxxxx>
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 2:25 pm
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: hopefully question isn't silly
Hi Sam,
We use 5.8e7 for copper conductivity. You asked for loss tangent which is a
dielectric material property. the larger the conductivity the more resistive
the conductor is.
Mike DeVita
Staff Engineer,
Application and Characterization Engineering
VM 480 821-2408 ext 5021
EM mdevi@xxxxxxxxx
FAX 480 855-6345
Sent by: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
sjchar3
10/16/2007 02:20 PM
Please respond to
icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
[PCB_FORUM] Re: hopefully question isn't silly
found an answer, 59.6 X 10^6 but the tool has a default value to 595900, I
guess that will have to do.
-----Original Message-----
From: sjchar3@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 2:15 pm
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] hopefully question isn't silly
Group: Setting up "Layout Cross Section" and the top layer is 1 oz copper. In
the same row it asks for conductivity, dielectric, loss tangent. Anyone know
the loss tangent for copper?
Sam
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- Unlimited storage and industry-leading
spam and email virus protection.
________________________________________________________________________
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- Unlimited storage and industry-leading
spam and email virus protection.
- References:
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: hopefully question isn't silly
- From: Mike DeVita
Other related posts:
- » [PCB_FORUM] hopefully question isn't silly
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: hopefully question isn't silly
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: hopefully question isn't silly
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: hopefully question isn't silly
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: hopefully question isn't silly
- From: Mike DeVita