[PCB_FORUM] Re: capture vs concept /autorouting ddr2 with allegro possible?

  • From: J-Charles TEYSSIER <jcteyssier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 07:56:47 +0200

Samuel,
orcad capture is easier to use, generally speaking, and this is the main problem:
I work with guies using concept: NO problem because they have to be rigorous
I work with guies usint capture and i have NEVER seen a schematic which can be pass to allegro at the first shot.

According to me, capture is a "small" soft compare to concept and you can do everything (and the worse!) to easely so users just "daw" schematic instead of builinding a database.
Now, it is possible to do good job with capture but i think it requires more personnal rigor than concept to obtain the same service.

If capture and orcad are compared to OS, i should say:
Capture is win98se
Concept is winxppro or suse

Jean-Charles

Samuel Cais a écrit :

Hello group,

 

We are using project manager,concept 15.51-s010 and allegro 15.51 s035.

We’ll  perhaps change concept for capture (orcad).

I don’t know capture so i would like to know basicaly what are the advantages of each tool.

 

My 2nd question is for the ddr2.We are spending a lot of time adapting the length and I was wondering if the cadence autorouter is abable to route and adapt in length traces and if it is doing decent job?

 

Thank you

 

Samuel

 

----------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe/unsubscribe: Send a message to icu-pcb-forum-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of subscribe or unsubscribe To view the archives of this list go to //www.freelists.org/archives/icu-pcb-forum/ Problems or Questions: Send an email to icu-pcb-forum-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -----------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. icu-pcb-forum
  3. Archive
  4. 06-2006