[ibis-quality] Re: my votes

  • From: Robert Haller <rhaller@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: ibis-quality@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:08:04 -0400

Yes ,
   I agree that we should rank them all 1,2, or 3
Bob

Bob Ross wrote:

Mike:

Maybe I misunderstood, but I thought we were to rank them
all on a scale of 1 to 3 (1 being the highest priority).

Bob

Mike LaBonte (milabont) wrote:

As discussed in today's phone call, here are my votes for the top 3 IQ
checks that should become ibischk caution messages:

1) 4.2.3  {LEVEL 1}  [Model] Vinl and Vinh enclose Vmeas
2) 4.3.2  {LEVEL 1}  I-V tables have correct typ/min/max order
3) 3.2.4  {OPTIONAL} [Pin] RLC complete

Mike
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IBIS Quality website:  http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/quality_wip/
IBIS Quality archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/ibis-quality
To unsubscribe send an email:
  To: ibis-quality-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: unsubscribe


---------------------------------------------------------------------
IBIS Quality website:  http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/quality_wip/
IBIS Quality archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/ibis-quality
To unsubscribe send an email:
 To: ibis-quality-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Subject: unsubscribe

Other related posts: