Walter,
Thanks for your suggestion. I think you should resend this
email to some of the other IBIS reflectors, because this is
really not an "ATM decision". Would you mind doing that to
cover a more appropriate audience?
Thanks,
Arpad
============================================================
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] ;
On Behalf Of Walter Katz
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 1:49 PM
To: IBIS-ATM <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ibis-macro] Proposed IBIS 6.2 Plan
All,
I propose that we should restart IBIS Editorial meetings with the goal to
complete the editorial changes for IBIS 6.2, and that we formally submit IBIS
6.2 Draft 1 to the Open Forum. I do not propose that IBIS 6.2 be approved by
the Open Forum. It is a checkpoint for IBIS 7.0. At any time, the Editorial can
restart again when there are sufficient approved BIRDS for IBIS 7.0 to make
these changes to IBIS 6.2.
When we get around to approving IBIS 7.0, we can look at the changes between
6.1 and 6.2, and the changes from 6.2 to 7.0 independently.
Walter
Walter Katz
wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Phone 303.449-2308
Mobile 303.335-6156
