[ibis-macro] Re: Process to "finish" the AMI BIRD

  • From: <fangyi_rao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:10:32 -0700

Hi, Walter;

 

Thanks for the updated document. Can you clarify following questions regarding 
the BIRD?

 

1.       On page 11, statement "All reserved parameters must contain 
sub-parameters Usage, Type, and one of the Allowed-Values sub-parameters." is 
contradictory to statement "If a Reserved Parameter must have one and only one 
Usage, Usage is optional. If a Reserved Parameter must have one and only one 
Type, Type is optional." on page 7 and some examples.

 

2.       On page 18, should the order of array values in the parameter string 
follows the order of the leaves appear in the branch? If yes, how does the ibis 
parser make sure such order information is passed to EDA tools?

 

3.       On page 24, the document states that "The impulse values are in 
volts". I think the unit of impulse should be volt/sec because by definition 
impulse*dt is in volt.

 

4.       On page 25, should "element[n]" be "element[n,0]"?

 

 

Regards,

Fangyi

 

From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Walter Katz
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 6:32 AM
To: IBIS-ATM
Subject: [ibis-macro] Process to "finish" the AMI BIRD

 

All,

 

I think Tuesday's discussion was extremely productive because it covered all of 
the types of changes in the BIRD in microcosm. It also became clear to me that 
we need a more efficient way of getting through the BIRD.

 

For next Tuesday's meeting I intend to review the changes I made to 
introduction to AMI file, including a discussion on the parameter tree 
structure. I will then review the sections we discussed last week, and will 
confirm that it reflects what I think we agreed to. I then plan to discuss the 
process that we need to follow to get this done. I think a key part of this 
process is for committee members to read the document and communicate by e-mail 
questions, comments, and suggestions prior to the next meeting. I would 
facilitate this by sending after each Tuesday meeting an e-mail containing the 
latest revision of the document along with an agenda of sections to be discuss 
in the next meeting. This is the first of such e-mails. I would encourage 
members to send e-mails either to the ATM reflector, or by sending e-mails to 
me directly. 

 

For the meeting on Tuesday, January 12, I will review pages 4-8, and pages 
26-27. 

 

Walter 

 

Walter Katz

303.449-2308

Mobile 720.333-1107

wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx

www.sisoft.com

 

Other related posts: