[ibis-macro] Re: Mea Culpa, my critique of the Crosstalk BIRD last week was incorrect.
- From: Ambrish Varma <ambrishv@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'IBIS-ATM'" <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 08:47:32 -0800
Hi Walter,
If I am not wrong, there is a slight problem with your example.
Instead of
"The impulse matrix to input RxV is
SDD(RxV,TxV)' SDD(RxV,Tx1)' SDD(Rx2,Tx2)'
The impulse response output of RxV is
SDD(RxV,TxV)'' SDD(RxV,Tx1)'' SDD(Rx2,Tx2)'' (All three include RxV filter)"
Shouldn't it be:
"The impulse matrix to input RxV is
SDD(RxV,TxV)' SDD(RxV,Tx1)' SDD(RxV,Tx2)'
The impulse response output of RxV is
SDD(RxV,TxV)'' SDD(RxV,Tx1)'' SDD(RxV,Tx2)'' (All three include RxV filter)"
Thanks,
-Ambrish.
[cid:image002.gif@01CBDD86.9C462530]
Ambrish Varma | Member of Consulting Staff
P: 978.262.6431 www.cadence.com<http://www.cadence.com>
________________________________
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Walter Katz
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 10:53 AM
To: Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx; 'IBIS-ATM'
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: Mea Culpa, my critique of the Crosstalk BIRD last
week was incorrect.
Arpad,
Here it is again, one page, and some minor modifications. I do not care if this
example is in the BIRD, a reference in the minutes is sufficient for me, but I
have no objection if it is included. I think a request was mad for a graohic
example, as opposed to a mathematical example.
Walter
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 10:39 AM
To: IBIS-ATM
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: Mea Culpa, my critique of the Crosstalk BIRD last
week was incorrect.
Walter,
Is the 2nd page "left intentionally blank" in the PDF you
sent in the attachment? If so, would you mind removing it
and send it to us again so we could post a single page
document? Did you want this example in the BIRD also (and
ultimately in the spec)? Someone suggested in the previous
meetings that examples would be good, but I don't remember
for which BIRD it was suggested.
Thanks,
Arpad
============================================================
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Walter Katz
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 8:59 AM
To: IBIS-ATM
Subject: [ibis-macro] Mea Culpa, my critique of the Crosstalk BIRD last week
was incorrect.
All,
Mea Culpa, my critique of the Crosstalk BIRD last week was incorrect. After a
careful read I totally agree with the contents of the BIRD and would support a
motion to submit it to the Open Forum, with this committees concurrence.
Not for Naught!
I did document an example of a coupled system containing a single victim
channel and two aggressor channels. The various elements of the Impulse
Response are defined using Touchstone notation, and the input and output of the
impulse response matrix for each Tx and Rx AMI_Init function call is defined by
rows and columns in the differential mode, coupled sNp that represents any
coupled channel.
I would like this document posted, and I would like the weekly minutes to note
it.
Walter
Walter Katz
wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Phone 303.449-2308
Mobile 303.883-2120
Other related posts:
