Arpad, I have given this one a lot of thought, and realized my changing the BIRD text was another one of those perspective things. I'm pressed for time at the moment, but wanted to get this one the wire before I have to jump into a meeting ... If we agree models get called in the following sequence: TX AMI_Init -> RX AMI_Init -> TX AMI_Getwave -> RX AMI_Getwave Then the original text was okay and I shouldn't have changed it. I had a different perspective that let me to think the text needed to be changed. I realized the perspective I had was based on a particular context, one that didn't really reflect how these models would be executed in an operating EDA platform. I can go into detail how I got to that point, but I don't think it matters. If everyone else expected the calling sequence I listed above, then we should just go back to the original text. This will have been case of the editor trying to solve a problem that didn't exist. My apologies for the confusion. Todd. Todd Westerhoff VP, Software Products SiSoft 6 Clock Tower Place, Suite 250 Maynard, MA 01754 (978) 461-0449 x24 twesterh@xxxxxxxxxx www.sisoft.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- IBIS Macro website : http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/macromodel_wip/ IBIS Macro reflector: //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-macro To unsubscribe send an email: To: ibis-macro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: unsubscribe