Ah, then the kernel has shrunk since 2.2? :-X Ok, on Conical, Steve. GreyGeek wrote: > Bloat? > > IF all those drivers were indeed part of the Linux kernel, as one big > monolithic file, then it would bloated indeed. > But, they are not. While some drivers are compiled into the kernel > most are modules loaded, or unloaded, on demand. They exist as *.ko.gz > files under /lib/modules/[kernel version]/lib/ > GG > > Steve wrote: > >> Good presentation. The rate of change is amazing. >> >> I believe Linux passed NetBSD awhile go. Most of the "bloat" in Linux is >> due >> to the drivers. That's not really bloat, it's just required to support all >> of the hardware devices that it does. You can still compile a minimal >> kernel >> without all of the unneeded drivers and have a fully functional machine. >> >> Steve >> >> On Sunday 01 February 2009 05:06:41 James Worrest wrote: >> >> >>> The speaker asked if it was "scary" about the rate of change of the >>> kernel, it probably is >>> what is scary is the bloat! One complains, rightly, about Windows in >>> this area. It runs on >>> more processors than anything else? I thought NetBSD did. I just >>> looked at the first part >>> of it and I do hope to look at all of it, at a different time of day >>> when I can see the whole >>> thing. ---Jim >>> >>> Martin Wolff wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> The subject pretty much gives the description. It is an interesting >>>> video if you have some free time. It has some really interesting >>>> information about how quickly things are moving in the kernel now. >>>> >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2SED6sewRw >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> > > > ---- > Husker Linux Users Group mailing list > To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE > > > > ---- Husker Linux Users Group mailing list To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE