[HUG ] Re: A16 back

Everybody has to follow his own way.
A16S backs are of little use.
That is one of the reasons they are often found in as new condition.
If I were to make trannies they would be 6x6 size not the 4x4
Mickey Mouse size.

It is perfectly allright to turn useless A16S backs into A16 backs
that serve a purpose.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Q.G. de Bakker" <qnu@xxxxxxxxxx> 
To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 7:59 AM
Subject: [HUG ] Re: A16 back



flexbody wrote:


They are an excellent source for parts or will make a very good A16
back after the 4x4 mask has been exchanged for one from a worn
A16 back.


I see we got stuck in in repeat-mode.
So here goes:


An A16 is also a nice source for parts an A16 may need.
Also cheap. And, compared to A16S backs, positively abundant.
So why reduce the numbers of A16S backs that are out there to fix a more common A16? Don't! 



=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. 




=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: