[openbeos] Re: udf/makeudfimage v1.0.0 beta 1
- From: Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:14:46 -0800
On 2004-01-19 at 13:55:02 [-0800], François Revol wrote:
> [...]
> > So I'm not sure what I am going to do. :-) I will support UDF 1.50
> > for
> > plain directories and files (and eventually symlinks) at the very
> > least. As
> > far as attributes/indices, we'll see... :-)
> >
> Since attributes and indices don't make much sense for other
> OSes right now, I'd say since we can read UDF 2.01 why not use
> that one ?
Just in case you want to burn your MP3 collection with attributes and
indices but still be able to read the disc in OSX or anywhere else they
don't support UDF 2.01 yet. Although, since I want to add UDF/iso9660
hybrid support eventually, too (since my RioVolt doesn't speak UDF :-),
those who need their discs readable somewhere that doesn't support UDF 2.01
could just make hybrid discs. That probably makes the most sense. So I will
tenatively plan to support plain files, directories, and symlinks in UDF
1.50, and additionally support attributes and indices in UDF 2.01.
-Tyler
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: udf/makeudfimage v1.0.0 beta 1
- From: Axel Dörfler
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: udf/makeudfimage v1.0.0 beta 1
- From: François Revol
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] udf/makeudfimage v1.0.0 beta 1
- » [openbeos] Re: udf/makeudfimage v1.0.0 beta 1
- » [openbeos] Re: udf/makeudfimage v1.0.0 beta 1
- » [openbeos] Re: udf/makeudfimage v1.0.0 beta 1
- » [openbeos] Re: udf/makeudfimage v1.0.0 beta 1
- » [openbeos] Re: udf/makeudfimage v1.0.0 beta 1
- » [openbeos] Re: udf/makeudfimage v1.0.0 beta 1
- » [openbeos] Re: udf/makeudfimage v1.0.0 beta 1
- [openbeos] Re: udf/makeudfimage v1.0.0 beta 1
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [openbeos] Re: udf/makeudfimage v1.0.0 beta 1
- From: François Revol