On 2004-01-19 at 13:55:02 [-0800], François Revol wrote: > [...] > > So I'm not sure what I am going to do. :-) I will support UDF 1.50 > > for > > plain directories and files (and eventually symlinks) at the very > > least. As > > far as attributes/indices, we'll see... :-) > > > Since attributes and indices don't make much sense for other > OSes right now, I'd say since we can read UDF 2.01 why not use > that one ? Just in case you want to burn your MP3 collection with attributes and indices but still be able to read the disc in OSX or anywhere else they don't support UDF 2.01 yet. Although, since I want to add UDF/iso9660 hybrid support eventually, too (since my RioVolt doesn't speak UDF :-), those who need their discs readable somewhere that doesn't support UDF 2.01 could just make hybrid discs. That probably makes the most sense. So I will tenatively plan to support plain files, directories, and symlinks in UDF 1.50, and additionally support attributes and indices in UDF 2.01. -Tyler