"Alexander G. M. Smith" <agmsmith@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Michael Phipps wrote on Mon, 02 Jun 2003 18:03:03 -0400: > > There will be a kernel virtual space that is mapped into every > > process. How big > > this is is yet to be determined. Let's say, for the sake of > > arguement, it is 1 gb. > > This means that you (the user) can have an amount of mapped memory > > that > > approaches 3 gb. Probably not quite all of that, but close. > Grumble. Smaller RAM disk size then, since it uses Kernel memory for > simplicity > (no need to explicitly map it for each different calling process - > saves time and > avoids an extra copy operation). I think we will use the same as almost all other operating systems out there, which is 2 GB for the kernel, and about the same amount for userland apps. I don't see a reason why we should change this - we are certainly not the place for database applications that could need such an amount of memory. That's what Solaris is good for, and even they normally have that 2/2 split (though you can change it there to 3/1 as well). Adios... Axel.