"Stephan Assmus" <superstippi@xxxxxx> wrote: > > For those that wonder, under Linux both Subversion and Jam are much > > faster than they are on BeOS. Expect that to improve under Haiku ;- > > ) > I almost don't dare ask you a question, because it distracts you from > work on Haiku... :-) but how exactly can the Haiku BFS be improved in > that regard? Or are there other factors that influence small file > performance? A binary compatible BFS will never be good with small files - the indexes have too much overhead. In Haiku, the situation will still be much better as it is in BeOS as a) we will have a real cache, and b) the B+tree implementation is much faster as well (mostly visible on write access, though). However, I don't expect BFS competing with ReiserFS on this one - your Linux box will always be faster there for now :-) Bye, Axel.