[openbeos] Re: big kernel move in the repository
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 03:26:02 +0200 CEST
"Stephan Assmus" <superstippi@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > For those that wonder, under Linux both Subversion and Jam are much
> > faster than they are on BeOS. Expect that to improve under Haiku ;-
> > )
> I almost don't dare ask you a question, because it distracts you from
> work on Haiku... :-) but how exactly can the Haiku BFS be improved in
> that regard? Or are there other factors that influence small file
> performance?
A binary compatible BFS will never be good with small files - the
indexes have too much overhead.
In Haiku, the situation will still be much better as it is in BeOS as
a) we will have a real cache, and b) the B+tree implementation is much
faster as well (mostly visible on write access, though).
However, I don't expect BFS competing with ReiserFS on this one - your
Linux box will always be faster there for now :-)
Bye,
Axel.
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: big kernel move in the repository
- From: Stephan Assmus
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] big kernel move in the repository
- » [openbeos] Re: big kernel move in the repository
- » [openbeos] Re: big kernel move in the repository
- » [openbeos] Re: big kernel move in the repository
- » [openbeos] Re: big kernel move in the repository
- » [openbeos] Re: big kernel move in the repository
- » [openbeos] Re: big kernel move in the repository
- » [openbeos] Re: big kernel move in the repository
- » [openbeos] Re: big kernel move in the repository
- » [openbeos] Re: big kernel move in the repository
- [openbeos] Re: big kernel move in the repository
- From: Stephan Assmus