From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > "Adi Oanca" <e2joseph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > One simple question: > > > > Why do we use our POSIX headers, if they are not completely > > functional? > > > > for example I want to use 'lroundf()' function found in math.h. > > Our headers don't have that function! > > Then simply add that function. :-))) I know that you are serious, but I wont'de that. Somebody else is responsible. Plus I don't know if I can do it right. I see we have some sources for some posix functions(from BSD?). When you guys tooked(en?) them, why didn't you took them all? > We build against our own headers to ensure R5 compatibility. Also, we > are targetting an independent build environment. How can we build, if we don't have basic functionality, like round() for example... Didn't you guys said some time ago, that we'll use R5's libroot.so until ours is done? Adi.