> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 21:03, scott mc <scottmc2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Well, we probably also need to do a review of all the various licenses > > involved with the OptionalPackages and any outside sources that are > > built into Haiku as there might be a few that limit commercial > > distributions. > > > Here's a search of the source, which turns up 30 hits, and this > > doesn't check all of the OptionalPackages. > > http://haiku.it.su.se:8180/source/search?q=non-commercial&defs=&refs=&path=&hist= > > > > PDFLib for example... and even some old Be code... perhaps we could > > get permission from the original authors to update the license on > > these files? > > This is an excellent opportunity for someone to make a non-development > contribution that will directly remove a TODO from another person's > list ... in this case, most likely mine. > > A list of which software or directories contain "for non-commercial > use" licenses/disclaimers, the respective copyright holder, and a way > to contact them would go a long way as motivation. > > That list could then be sent to this list or even the haiku-inc > mailing list: www.freelists.org/list/haiku-inc > > This would be the first step toward establishing how Haiku can be used > in and by commercial endeavors, which was one of the driving factors > in choosing the MIT license. > > Cheers > > --mmadia Would writiting down the other (non-MIT) licenses be of use? For example, some of the modules or libraries that use LGPL and GPL code? _________________________________________________________________ The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccount&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4