> >Hey Michael, > >Thanks for the article, > >Correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that trips to >kernel land were not expensive within the BeOS, since the kernel area >was mapped into the lower portion of every process's memory area, and >therefore trips to kernel land do not require a context switch but >merely a switch in and out of x86 protected mode. . . Trips to kernel land cost. Cheaper or more expensive, they still cost. I don't know what they will finally end up costing, when we are done. If I can eliminate one, all the better. :-) >Also your article kinda reminded me of the following link about >freebsd's copy on write implementation, if you haven't seen it before >you'll probably find it interesting: >http://www.daemonnews.org/200001/freebsd_vm.html Very interesting article. Thanks for a good read. >Cheers, >-Steffen