On 2010-07-12 at 20:48:12 [+0200], Nathan Mentley <nathanmentley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > you've been rather quiet recently. I hope everything is OK. You know that > > whatever technical problems you run into, we'll be glad to assist you -- > > just ask. If anything personal affecting your work has come up, please > > drop > > a mail to your mentor or our GSoC admin, Matt (or this list, if you > > prefer), so we can work out how to procede. > > > > Just in case you planned to finish your work in solitude and just drop us > > the result at the end of the coding period, it is much preferred by us -- > > and necessary for the mid term evaluation anyway -- to get incremental > > patches in not too long intervals. If I understood you correctly the > > gcc/binutils patch works fine, so that would be a great candidate to send > > us. Also the boot loader changes -- whether they already works perfectly > > or > > not -- would be nice to see. > > Sorry about my silence. I have no excuses for that. > > I can however upload a patch in a few hours after a bit of code cleanup. > I have gcc/binutils working, the kernel compiling with temporary void > functions, and the bootloader is almost working. I've ran into some > relocation errors that weren't happening with smaller test elf64 > binaries, but are popping up while testing with a much larger elf64 > kernel. I'm pretty sure I'll nail those bugs down in the next few hours. > hopefully. > > What would be the best way to upload the svn diff output? The text file > is roughly 200kb which I feel might be a bit large for a mailing list. Oh my, no one really likes to read such a monster patch. Please attach it to a Trac ticket, ideally split up into independent individual patches, if possible. > Again, Sorry for my isolation, I'll try to remain more open with the > development. That would be much appreciated. CU, Ingo