Niels Reedijk wrote:
I believe that documentation has to be structured, else it will be a big collection of thoughts that end up nowhere.
I concur.
So my suggestion would be that a few interested individuals work together for a while, to try out some things, draft up some standards and then open up for business for the main public.
Scott, if you'd like to, we can continue working on that attributes & queries doc in odf format and step by step work out the style. When we think we're ready we beg the web team to convert this into a wiki and have others chime in for fine tuning. With that we work out a kind of docu styleguide and come up with the chapters that should be covered. After that it's simply filling in the blanks... :)
In this sense I see a bright future of webcasts. Short how-to like videos that show you, step by step, how to perform certain tasks. The division into steps is a good idea, because associated with the webcast comes a short document that sums up all the actions (and ideally you could click on one of them to jump to the specific moment in the webcast video).
I have no experience with webcasts. The things you young folks keep coming up with... :)Maybe we can add links to examples to each chapter. Those could be webcasts, traditional docu or a mix, as you suggested. Or youtube videos or flash animations, or what have you.
Kind regards, Humdinger -- --=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-- Deutsche Haiku News @ http://haiku-gazette.blogspot.com