[haiku-development] Re: object on the hype, using it as parameter and then use delete

  • From: Fredrik Modéen <fredrik@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:45:57 +0200 (CEST)

> 2008/9/12 Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>:
>>
>> On 2008-09-12 at 14:48:49 [+0200], Stefano Ceccherini
>> <stefano.ceccherini@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 2008/9/12 Michael Lotz <mmlr@xxxxxxxx>:
>>>
>>> > You make the same assumption that new cannot fail in r27448 which I
>>> find
>>> > a bad
>>> > idea. You could say that it is true that new cannot return NULL,
>>> since it
>>> > should actually throw an error and not return NULL. However this is
>>> not a
>>> > reason to strip the NULL checks, but to make new into
>>> new(std::nothrow)
>>> > which
>>> > actually returns NULL on a failed allocation (which can always
>>> happen). I
>>> > thought we had the general consensus that we use new(std::nothrow)
>>> and
>>> > always
>>> > check the result, but I'm not sure how the other see it.
>>>
>>> Yep I am for the nothrow + NULL check, too.
>>
>> +1
>>
>>> BTW I think that it should be clear that the Coverity reports aren't
>>> bulletproof: IOW: one should do a "manual" analysis before changing
>>> code based on the reports.
>>
>> Absolutely! I believe most of the kernel "defects" I have checked so far
>> refer to correct code. E.g. the "double deletion" checker seems to be
>> totally lost when analyzing code using reference counting. Maybe we
>> should
>> collect and document these kinds of patterns somewhere.
>
> Yes, I noticed that too.
> Coverity also can't know that there are some classes which autodeletes
> themselves on quit.
> For example, BAlert, BWindow, etc.
Are BMessage one of those?

this would be interesting to me if nothing else :)
are these documented somewhere?

> Some other like BMediaTrack should not be deleted by the user either.
>
>> If I understand it correctly, we can also have a mailing list where the
>> Coverity tool and its problems can be discussed and which is also read
>> by
>> the Coverity people.
>
> Interesting, so we should for example point out the things I just
> mentioned ?
>
>


-- 
MVH
Fredrik Modéen


Other related posts: