On 3/10/14, 5:35 PM, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: [...] > * An old processor gives a lower throughput in MB/s when using Deflate than > just reading the file form the hard disk. Is there a block cache in between the hpkg virtual file system and the user? If so, then this will amelioriate a lot of the performance problems. (If not, there should be...) In fact, given the kind access patterns that this kind of application usually gets, it might make sense for the hpkg virtual file system to bypass the block cache on the real filesystem --- there's no point cacheing the compressed *and* uncompressed data. -- ┌─── ｄｇ＠ｃｏｗｌａｒｋ．ｃｏｍ ───── http://www.cowlark.com ───── │ │ "You cannot truly appreciate _Atlas Shrugged_ until you have read it │ in the original Klingon." --- Sea Wasp on r.a.sf.w
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
