Am 16.03.2014 um 16:48 schrieb Julian Harnath <julian.harnath@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Another option would be switching the hpkg compression algorithm to > LZ4, which is optimized for performance and many times faster than > DEFLATE. It's the commonly used compression algorithm in ZFS. See > benchmark comparison here: http://code.google.com/p/lz4/ (in Web+ that > table looks messed up though) I agree that this would be better for storing it on disk, or maybe LZO. The problem is: That means larger files to transfer over the net, as compressing something compressed is inefficient. That's exactly the whole point: We should not use the same compression for transfering an hpkg and storing an hpkg. That was my idea: Leave the hpkg itself uncompressed, and compress it on the file system (e.g. using LZO, LZ4) and compress it during transfer (e.g. LZMA). That'll give the best of both worlds. -- Jonathan