[gps-talkusers] Re: Holux GPSlim236 DB Rating
- From: "Kevin Chao" <g.unit89@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:43:22 -0700
Charles,
I thought that value look rather odd. I copied those particular values
directly from the GPSlim236 User Guide in the 40docs.zip.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles LaPierre
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 7:36 AM
To: gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gps-talkusers] Re: Holux GPSlim236 DB Rating
Hi Kevin,
I think you have a typo in your statement on the Holux Slim 236 Its
receiving satellite signal strength is Minimum signal tracked: -159dBW
The M-1000
Minimum signal tracked : -159dBm
Bluetooth input sensitivity: -85dBm
So the satellite signal strengths are identical.
The biggest difference is the chipset being used the MTK MT3318 vs the Sirf
III for the Slim236 and the # of channels to track satellites 32 vs 20 for
the Slim236.
Charles
At 03:55 PM 10/15/2007, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I can't recall who asked about the DB rating of the Holux, but here it is:
>
>* Bluetooth Input Sensitivity: -80dbm
>* Low sensitivity of receiving satellite signal : -189 dBW
>
>I couldn't find the one for the M-1000 but recalled that it was either
>the same or even lower.
>
>Kevin
>
Charles M. La Pierre CTO
Sendero Group, LLC
Lat. 37 15' 25" N Lon: 121 53' 04" W
Other related posts:
