[gmpi] Re: GMPI reqs draft 1 (part 2) for review
- From: David Olofson <david@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 22:49:30 +0100
On Saturday 25 December 2004 03.16, Tim Hockin wrote:
> Hey all. we're ALMOST DONE!@!!!
>
> Can I get anyone to spend some of their precious end-of-year time
> reviewing the last chunk of the reqs?
>
> Please read over sections 3.16 through 3.23 (and associated "more
> info" sections). Comments, spelling, grammar, wording, or
> arguments are welcome.
>
> http://www.gmpi-plugins.org/gmpi/requirements.php
Sorry about lurking (if even that) for so long. The state at work is
(as usual) basically "we need to be done yesterday", and the rest of
my energy, and then some, is consumed by rebuilding the house and
other Real Life stuff.
Anyway, I read through the whole document while I was at it. Sections
3.16 through 3.23 look fine to me.
Small note on 4.10: Ramped or Smoothed Events
"In fact, these audio-rate events can eliminate the
need for ramps altogether."
It might be worth noting that audio rate controls - actual
or this bybrid kind - add hidden costs (downsampling) when
plugins morph internal coefficients to avoid doing the full
control value to coefficients transform for each sample.
Of course, actual test data may prove that the cost of
downsampling audio rate control data is insignificant. I
guess this is sort of covered by the "experimental" part,
but anyway...
//David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate
.- Audiality -----------------------------------------------.
| Free/Open Source audio engine for games and multimedia. |
| MIDI, modular synthesis, real time effects, scripting,... |
`-----------------------------------> http://audiality.org -'
--- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: GMPI reqs draft 1 (part 2) for review
- From: Jeff McClintock
- References:
- [gmpi] GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] GMPI reqs draft 1 (part 2) for review
- From: Tim Hockin
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] GMPI reqs draft 1 (part 2) for review
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI reqs draft 1 (part 2) for review
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI reqs draft 1 (part 2) for review
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI reqs draft 1 (part 2) for review
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI reqs draft 1 (part 2) for review
- [gmpi] Re: GMPI reqs draft 1 (part 2) for review
- From: Jeff McClintock
- [gmpi] GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] GMPI reqs draft 1 (part 2) for review
- From: Tim Hockin