[glideplan_swproj] Re: libraries
- From: Cestmir Houska <czestmyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: glideplan_swproj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 17:23:27 +0100
Ah, I just remembered - Qt didn't allow us to create static plugins
when it was dynamically linked. So we would have to link the
non-plugin libraries our own way (independently of Qt).
Cestmir
2012/2/7 Cestmir Houska <czestmyr@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Yes, I meant non-plugin libraries. But I just realized that at the
> beginning of the project, we had some problem with static vs. dynamic
> linking. I just can't remember what it was...
>
> Cestmir
>
> 2012/2/7 Tomáš Zámečník <pulcik@xxxxxxxx>:
>> You mean linked during build?
>> Because of the possibility of adding/removing single plugins.
>> In case of non-plugin libraries I agree. I think they could be static.
>>
>> T.
>>
>>> ------------ Původní zpráva ------------
>>> Od: Cestmir Houska <czestmyr@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Předmět: [glideplan_swproj] libraries
>>> Datum: 07.2.2012 16:46:31
>>> ----------------------------------------
>>> HI,
>>>
>>> I am searching for the solution to the problem with linking of
>>> libraries on Linux (and possibly Mac) and it suddenly struck me - why
>>> don't we make all the libraries static??
>>>
>>> Cestmir
>>>
>>> To visit archive or unsubscribe, follow:
>>> //www.freelists.org/list/glideplan_swproj
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> To visit archive or unsubscribe, follow:
>> //www.freelists.org/list/glideplan_swproj
To visit archive or unsubscribe, follow:
//www.freelists.org/list/glideplan_swproj
Other related posts:
