[glideplan_swproj] Re: [glideplan_swproj] Re: libraries

  • From: Tomáš Zámečník <pulcik@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: glideplan_swproj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:23:36 +0100 (CET)

I don't know, maybe it is somewhere in mailing list.
T.

> ------------ Původní zpráva ------------
> Od: Cestmir Houska <czestmyr@xxxxxxxxx>
> Předmět: [glideplan_swproj] Re: libraries
> Datum: 07.2.2012 17:22:11
> ----------------------------------------
> Yes, I meant non-plugin libraries. But I just realized that at the
> beginning of the project, we had some problem with static vs. dynamic
> linking. I just can't remember what it was...
>
> Cestmir
>
> 2012/2/7 Tomáš Zámečník <pulcik@xxxxxxxx>:
> > You mean linked during build?
> > Because of the possibility of adding/removing single plugins.
> > In case of non-plugin libraries I agree. I think they could be static.
> >
> > T.
> >
> >> ------------ Původní zpráva ------------
> >> Od: Cestmir Houska <czestmyr@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Předmět: [glideplan_swproj] libraries
> >> Datum: 07.2.2012 16:46:31
> >> ----------------------------------------
> >> HI,
> >>
> >> I am searching for the solution to the problem with linking of
> >> libraries on Linux (and possibly Mac) and it suddenly struck me - why
> >> don't we make all the libraries static??
> >>
> >> Cestmir
> >>
> >> To visit archive or unsubscribe, follow:
> >> http://www.freelists.org/list/glideplan_swproj
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > To visit archive or unsubscribe, follow:
> > http://www.freelists.org/list/glideplan_swproj
>
> To visit archive or unsubscribe, follow:
> http://www.freelists.org/list/glideplan_swproj
>
>
>

To visit archive or unsubscribe, follow:
http://www.freelists.org/list/glideplan_swproj

Other related posts: