[geocentrism] Re: tsunami
- From: "Philip" <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:07:34 +1000
to nick,
Was also wondering your geocentric view on the claims that the recent
earthquake/tsunami cause the earth's "rotation" to change slightly, i.e.
caused the length of the day to change slightly.
Regards,
Nick.
Nick I went to the NASA report. They claimed this aberation was a calculation
only and not proven by any measurement....Which means its just a thought....LOL.
Phil.
----- Original Message -----
From: Niemann, Nicholas K.
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 10:15 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: tsunami
Hi Neville,
Interesting discussion. Have you done any visual charts to demonstrate
the Nasa position and yours.
Was also wondering your geocentric view on the claims that the recent
earthquake/tsunami cause the earth's "rotation" to change slightly, i.e.
caused the length of the day to change slightly.
Regards,
Nick.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dr. Neville Jones [mailto:ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 6:07 PM
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: re Nevilles small universe.
Philip <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<<< [Now I am confused. So you do not deny we could supply the energy to
hit the moon, only that we would not have the energy to control the
landing. Also from your No 2 below, you only admit of a navigation
problem. Surely the distances involved would give us no reason to need
the stars for navigation, only the relative motions being necessary.
Apparently your objection is only scientific and not scriptual, which
supports my contentention, that a moon landing would not destroy
geocentrism, merely be a cause for a revised scientific position.
Philip] >>>
NASA claimed that the differential speed could only be at most 2
feet/second. They also claimed that when the "Eagle" (that name alone
should set alarm bells ringing) landed, it had less than 30 seconds of
fuel remaining. If the Moon is at the distance claimed, then in a
geostatic cosmos, it is travelling E->W at 61,200 mph. The spaceship
would be doing something like 2,300 mph W->E. That means that the thing
smashes into the Moon at 63,500 mph. NASA themselves claimed that they
navigated by the stars (see the website article, "Stars, what stars?").
Indeed, they would have to have navigated by them (or by the Sun) in a
heliocentric universe.
My objections, so far, are scientific rather than Scriptural, yes. I
therefore accept your point.
Neville.
---------------------------------
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!
-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: text/plain
-- File: InterScan_Disclaimer.txt
Other related posts:
