[geocentrism] Re: geocentrist banned after one post
- From: "Philip" <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 07:36:23 +1000
Philip, if you ever brave the waters, let us know your thread.
Sincerely,
Gary Shelton
Gary, I am never offensive, Stirrer, yes , so it was not me at BA.....If I
go
there I will be quite openly me.. Perhaps they only ban the really
intelligent people.....(sorry no offense intended, Garry but you have been
openly admitting your lack of knowledge in some scientific areas, and they
are taunting you), whereas I get cheeky as soon as I evaluate the level of
my opposition.
When they become humble then I will welcome them with the same amount and
more. So,
Tell me how to join, and I'll test them out.....
For now, I am reading up on Sungenis and his universal Mass.
I am attracted to this theory, but not to the weak way he puts up his
arguments. He seems to avoid the well put points of his opponents.
All my life I have found among my peers in the technical and
scientific community, jealousy, envy, ambition/advancement (at any cost),
desire for income at any cost, (perhaps the worst), secret inferiority that
drives them to put down any competition they perceive as a threat to their
position et al.....
Naturally these will rise to positions, like politicians, at the top, and
will propagate anything, like the nuclear winter, greenhouse hoax, ozone
hole lie, dangerous pharmaceuticals, ad infinitum. without principle just
for the money or the glory. And these are todays teachers of our youth.
Now I am not saying that Sungenis or Neville, are of this crowd, but it
is a difficult task to remain uncontaminated by universal error.
If Neville, and Sungenis had delved into the physicals of science, such as
the
likes of Faraday and Tesla did, and less of the mathmatical maze, that
Einstein and Maxwell did, though these men had a good basic physical
understanding of physical reality, then perhaps they would be able to argue
reality far better than I ever could. No offense Neville, but you seem to
have never
bothered to look into Electromagnetic radiation in physical space, and
its practical applications. That is just one example. Sungenis likewise.
This is not a criticism, just a practical reality of todays world of
specialisation.
When I was an apprentice for the Electrical fitter and mechanic trade back
in 48, In addition to several others, we did three subjects, Electrical
theory, (all of physics) Applied Electricity, the practical mathmatical
explanation of it "in the wire so to speak) and Electrical Trade work.
Designing it Making it and diagnosing and repairing it. Its not done like
that today. An electrician is a wireman. Universities produce designed
drones, who are taught what to think rather than how to think. And so we get
fanatical followers of the errors such as I mentioned above, the Ozone hole
being the most contemptuous of true science.
Modern science is corrupt, and universal error pervades. "For there shall
be a time when they will not endure sound doctrine but, according to their
own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers having itching ears: And
will indeed turn away their hearing from the truth, but will be turned unto
fables. 2Tim.4."
What an amazing prophecy.
Philip.
Other related posts:
