[geocentrism] Re: Supposed Moon landing of June 2003 -- Follow up
- From: "Cheryl" <c.battles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:31:51 -0500
Bob -- I think Christians should send out some probes, construct some
experiments to prove the Bible. Yes. I'm not sure what the experiments
would or should be. Perhaps sending a spaceship into the Earth's
atomosphere and measuring whether or not the ship is hit by 1,000-plus mph
winds?
Also, my understanding from my studies of Dr. Jones work other geocentrics,
stuff written by Walter Cooper and other whistleblowers, just reading stuff
put up on NASA's own website -- their photos are virtual reality. As Dr.
Jones says, telescopes do not enable us to see farther and farther out in
space. They only clarify and magnify what is visible to be seen. The
Hubble telescope produces images based on computerized data input, telling
us what we "would" see if we "could" see if all the things they told the
computerized telescope were true.
Based on the wacky things NASA says and does I would not trust their opinion
on ANYTHING. Did you read Dr. Jones spoof on NASA's moon water idea?
NASA is the only one with the big bucks and the great authority of the US
government behind it, with their big Hubbel telescope, skylab, space
shuttles (with spiders spinning web experiments) -- all that good stuff.
They also have their big radio dishes pointed out to space to talk to the
aliens and they are sending out the Voyager probes to try to meet them in
person. Meantime they are frantically looking for water on either the moon
or one of the planets in our solar system. Once they have that I expect
they will get on the side of the UFO people and say, yep, there's
intelligent life out there and yes it is visiting us.
The whole New Age religion is based upon communication with and eventually
surrendering our planet to these "Masters of the Unvierse."
Cheryl
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Davidson" <Jesus4me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 5:45 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Supposed Moon landing of June 2003 -- Follow up
> Cheryl, et al:
>
> I never received a response in the "What do we really know?" thread, so I
> would like to combine my question there with my answer to Cheryl's
> question
> here (in the form of more questions).
>
> This was my query:
> I'm sitting here scratching my head, not quite understanding how NASA
> could
> fake the existence of atmospheres on those planets [referring to Venus and
> Jupiter]. Aren't there dozens of extremely high-resolution telescopes all
> over the globe, run by people not affiliated with NASA, which have
> produced
> hundreds or thousands of pictures of these planets over the decades? I
> would also suspect that there are thousands of amateur astronomers, in
> every
> major country, with excellent telescopes capable of verifying the images
> of
> those planets as published by NASA. No?
>
> So whether we are questioning the authenticity of planetary images
> provided
> by NASA, or trips to the Moon sponsored by NASA in whole or in part, we
> are
> really talking about the depth and breadth of a conspiracy if NASA is not
> to
> be believed in either case. The burning questions are - 1) how can there
> be
> so much image fakery, with countless astronomers (professional and
> amateur)
> all over the World with equipment that can challenge the veracity of NASA
> images, and 2) is NASA actually capable of maintaining a global cover-up
> of
> gargantuan proportions with regard to man landing on the Moon, probes sent
> to other planets/moons, and the size of and distance to celestial objects,
> etc., when there are many different countries and private groups now
> involved (or about to be involved) in space exploration?
>
> I could almost guarantee that anyone who exposed such a conspiracy with
> proof would become an instant, worldwide, household name, and would be
> hauling appearance money to the bank by eighteen-wheelers backed up for
> miles. It is no longer credible to say that information is totally
> controlled by the government, major networks and newspapers. Talk radio,
> cable TV and the Internet have broken the monopoly, and there are plenty
> of
> people who would give lots of money and opportunity for exposure to anyone
> who could prove that we have all been snookered.
>
> As I alluded to in another post, rocketry and sensor technology are cheap
> enough today that sending an unbiased, unmanned mission into space to test
> some geostatic theories is now possible (IMO) if enough deep-pocket
> Christians are committed to getting the truth. Is there anyone else
> willing
> to throw in a few bucks? Does anyone disagree and think this would be
> impossible? Why or why not?
>
> Bob
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Cheryl
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 7:43 PM
> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Supposed Moon landing of June 2003 -- Follow up
>
> Bob -- This is a different moon project than the one you sent earlier.
> The
> earlier link pertained to a manned moon landing scheduled for this June
> 20,
> sponsored by a private commercial group that is going to work with NASA,
> take their spaceship up to the spacestation and assemble it there and then
> head on out to the moon. The link you just sent has to do with an
> unmanned
> flight scheduled for 2006 or 2007 cosponsored by NASA and the Ukranian
> government. Do you think the June 20 one is for real? Cheryl
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob Davidson" <Jesus4me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 10:39 AM
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Supposed Moon landing of June 2003 -- Follow up
>
>
>> Latest -
>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050310-120040-7846r.htm
>>
>> Bob
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bob Davidson
>> Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 10:31 PM
>> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Supposed Moon landing of June 2003 -- Follow
>> up
>>
>> Here are the links:
>>
>> 2005 - http://www.lunacorp.com/moon_orbit.htm
>> ???? - http://www.transorbital.net/index.html
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Cheryl B.
>> Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 9:38 PM
>> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [geocentrism] Supposed Moon landing of June 2003 -- Follow up
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain;
>> charset="iso-8859-1"
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>> All -- I wonder whatever happened to this jaunt to the moon scheduled =
>> for two years ago. Tried to find out on if anything was actually =
>> attempted but found out nothing. Anybody know anything about this? =
>> Cheryl
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
