[geocentrism] Re: SMOT et al
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "geocentrism list" <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:02:23 +1000
That search also revealed Donald Simanek's site. I'm sorry you feel the way you
do concerning his essay. I've been to his site many times and always found his
thoughts to be on the money. Paul.
Hmm. thats probably the reason you are haveing so much trouble arriving at the
truth...which isn't always on the money.. Grin.
ok yes he did make a correction for the magnetic drag or pull back as the ball
dropped, which did give me pause to think, yet he reasoned without
verification, based on antipathy, that this drag was equal in total to the
kinetic energy of acceleration added to the lifting potential energy. This as
observed does not appear to be the case in the demonstration shown by Naudins
measuring ramp/
I am not above suspecting fraud, but Naudin seems to have made some nice
machines, if they are real..
Re{ The fact that I can think of that means that someone else should have
thought of it long ago and industry should now be powered by them. The fact
that this isn't so just bears out what Donald S says about these devices.
Not necessarily so. The power gain is so negligible that all of us recognise it
only as a toy. and is probably why none has bothered to go that far with it.
The same is true of my proposed power of convection currents, (gravity) which
works, but is not practical as a motor on the scale models, but works good in
nature for the production of hydroelectric power.
Not to be rejected, of course, though you believe in the impeccability of big
business, who would NEVER conspire, (yes sarcasm) it is most likely that any
patent that works is bought out and never sees the light of day.. search fo
those guys who made cars to run on water and see how many died in mysterious
circumstances.
Sorry, but you are naive when it comes to big money, in particular those legal
counterfieters who create it out of thin air?
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Deema
To: Geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 6:06 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: SMOT et al
Philip M
Despite a decade or more of internet access, I'm afraid that Google is still
not my first reaction when I'm confronted by something new which I know is not
in my books. 'smot' is such a case. I found it after I had posted to you
initially on this subject and found http://jnaudin.free.fr... site but not the
page detailing the gyroscope. I'm impressed by the elegance of his design and
if I can find the time, I'd love to build one. I'd add a laser pointer and
mirror arrangement to permit very long pointers and thus accurate and short
response time measurements. Moving the centre of gravity up to the centre of
suspension I think would also be useful.
That search also revealed Donald Simanek's site. I'm sorry you feel the way
you do concerning his essay. I've been to his site many times and always found
his thoughts to be on the money. Have you looked at
http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/museum/unwork.htm#cheng? Scroll down to The
Gravity Shield Engine. I was impressed. This whole area of unworkable devices
is rewarding I think.
Regarding his debunking of the 'smot' device. If it really works as you
suggest, then you should be able to make a ring of them, five would probably be
enough, such that as the ball falls from one (with its height gain) and drops
into the next, then the next etc, you should be able to make the ball go around
the ring forever -- or at least.until it wears out. The fact that I can think
of that means that someone else should have thought of it long ago and industry
should now be powered by them. The fact that this isn't so just bears out what
Donald S says about these devices.
Paul D
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.25/743 - Release Date: 2/04/2007
4:24 PM
Other related posts:
