[geocentrism] Re: Negative parallax
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:40:10 +0100
Dear Neville,
Brilliant! I doubt though that Bouw would publish it. Why not send it to the
The Royal Astronomical Society?
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 1:38 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Negative parallax
>
> Let's have some fun and rewrite this paragraph: Astronomers are paid by
the taxpayers to collect data. They choose to hide some of this data. They
know the real truth and the taxpayers are too stupid to realize that 40%,
50%, 60%, . of the astronomers results are to be simply ignored. Until, that
is, the astronomers come up with a technique that better fits their
'knowledge' and 'understanding'. Then, having already decided what the
conclusion of their new technique must be, they find that the rubbish data
has to be retrieved from the dustbin, as it has suddenly become
indispensable.
Other related posts:
