[geocentrism] Re: More on aberration
- From: Alan Griffin <ajg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 18:37:29 +0100
On 09 Aug, Philip <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >From the geocentrist, I need an explanation.
> My physics book also used aberration to establish the speed of light.
> For their formular they used an established figure 30,557 meters per
> second for the caculated orbital speed of the earth around the sun.
> Taking the triangle I used before, with the angle of aberation of 20.45"
> and making the base line equal to the velocity of the earth, 30,557
> meters per second ,and the vertical line equal to the speed of light,
> using -- Tan 20.45 = 30557over V of light squared. .or .0001003
> Working back from the Tan tables this gave a fairly accurate 3.047 X
> 10/8th meters per second.
> If the earth is not moving, how do we account for the figures working
> out?
> Is it because they made the assumption that the base line measurement
> was due to earth movement rather than star movement.
> Yet for this to be so, it must involve a rather complex star/cosmos
> movement forward and backward annually in addition to the daily
> revolution, and the annual wobbling plate for the seasons.
> Seems like a lot of complexity, just to con someone into thinking that
> we rotated and revolved around the sun.
'Tis very true: O wise and upright judge!
How much more elder art thou than thy looks!
Alan
Other related posts:
