[geocentrism] Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts (Supplemenmtary)

  • From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 18:01:43 -0700 (PDT)

You'll have to be more specfic.. .?
   
  1. the only star trails seen are the nightly due to a nightl rotaion about an 
axis and the observers change to that axis
  2. the solar axis is a real not imaginary axis in the HC/AC construct
  3. in the HC/AC contruct the same reasons that produce nightly ones must 
produce an annual deviation from the nightly ..same action, same stars same 
thing only differnce is wich direction the real annual axis is pointing to but 
it is just as real as the nightly is 
   
  4 there is no deviation from the nightly roation no mater how you turn, twist 
or flip a camera...there is no reason that can be givne to support the idea 
that the annual would not be discerable that would not just a euqaly apply to 
the nightly trails...if the nightly trails produce so too must the annual for 
the exact same reasons.....but they dont thus it does not exist........
   
  that is all those drawings show is how the two axis are real and fucntion 
identicaly the same any reason to negat one would negate the other and any 
reason fthat demands ones existance demands the others existaince.......
   
  

philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
      No realy phil you must have two sets of star trails on two differnt 
axis.....
   
  what are you having difficulty with? No difficulty Allen, I just deny that  ^ 
in the sense you say it. Angles of view merely alter the perspective (aspect) 
of the same movement..  
   
  It all about photography Allen 
   
  Philip. 
  


    ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Allen Daves 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 9:54 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts (Supplemenmtary)
  

No realy phil you must have two sets of star trails on two differnt axis..If 
Regner is laughing it must be because he now relizes just how silly the HC/AC 
construct realy is.....what are you having difficulty with? 

philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:     DIV {   MARGIN: 0px  }       
     
  Allen D
OK -- I've looked at your drawings -- I'll address the issues tomorrow.
  Keep thinking though 'cos I think I will convince you that you have 
definately missed something. 
  Paul D
  You must be joking Allen..  Paul too...  Regner must be having a big laugh.. 
   
  Phil. 


    ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Paul Deema 
  To: Geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 5:03 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts (Supplemenmtary)
  

    
  Allen D
OK -- I've looked at your drawings -- I'll address the issues tomorrow.
  Keep thinking though 'cos I think I will convince you that you have 
definately missed something. 
  Paul D
  


  
---------------------------------
  National Bingo Night. Play along for the chance to win $10,000 every week. 
Download your gamecard now at Yahoo!7 TV.     
---------------------------------
    
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.18/1104 - Release Date: 1/11/2007 
6:47 PM


    
---------------------------------
    
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.19/1105 - Release Date: 2/11/2007 
11:04 AM

Other related posts: