[geocentrism] Fwd: Fw: Re: Michelson-Morley/Twins Paradox
- From: "Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:48:38 +0100 (BST)
Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:From: "Jack Lewis"
To: "Jones, Neville"
Subject: Fw: [geocentrism] Re: Michelson-Morley/Twins Paradox
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:14:05 +0100
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jack Lewis"
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: [geocentrism] Re: Michelson-Morley/Twins Paradox
> Dear Mike,
> If you think about it Mike its likely to be what their particular world
view
> is.
> Scientists are their own worst critics. So much of what is discussed as
> science seems to be unprovable assumptions - which is OK. You takes your
> pick and makes your choice. You prove something to me and I will accept
it,
> but for anything different I will have to use my judgement and that will
be
> coloured by my world view.
>
> Jack
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike"
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 12:41 PM
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Michelson-Morley/Twins Paradox
>
>
>
> > My actual question (I'm worzel on BA btw) was why you give so much
> > credence to Hoyle and place so much emphasis the Michel Morleyson
> > experiment and yet discount so many other scientists and why you place
> > so much emphasis on scientists opinions rather than on what they
> > contributed to scientific knowledge. By what criterea do you select the
> > scientists who's opinions you value over scientific evidence to the
> > contrary?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mike.
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!
Other related posts:
