[geocentrism] Fwd: Fw: Re: Angular momentum

  • From: "Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 01:28:59 +0100 (BST)

Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In simple terms (words) Mike, what is it that you are saying exactly?


Jack


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 10:10 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Angular momentum



> You incorrectly claimed that
> 
> (u1 + v1) > (u2 + v2)
> 
> held which ever way round you labelled the particles and consequently 
> incorrectly concluded that the resutlt was preposterous.
> 
> Regards,
> Mike.


                
---------------------------------
 ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!  


Other related posts: