Gary -- You and I know the earth is NOT moving. And do you really think that if the earth were turning at 1,000 mph that the clouds and atomosphere would be peacefully hanging above us? The atmosphere gets thinner and thinner as it gets farther out, with less and less gravity holding it. How can it be that there is no disturbance when the sun can't even keep itself together to turn as a unit as it rotates and its (the sun's) gravitational force is much greater than that of the Earth's? Marshall Hall is the one who first pointed this out in his website. I don't know anything about the physics, but it strikes me as making perfect common sense. Cheryl ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary Shelton" <garylshelton@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 10:55 PM Subject: [geocentrism] Fw: Ask an Astronomer question > Cheryl, > I believe the simple answer to your atmosphere question is Newton's first law. At least that's what the "Astronomer" was spelling out, I think. The outer edge of the atmosphere, once spinning, receives no drag from space and therefore maintains the speed originally imparted to it by the turning earth below. How the air turns with the earth and yet has its various swirling currents within the "whole" of the atmosphere rotating in sync with the earth brings me back to an old headache I'd rather not think about any more tonight. But that's the gist of the BA position. > > This always brings up the question, to me, of what happens to the atmosphere if the earth does move (as Bob Davidson has recently stated a few times)? Don't the movements of the earth--not that I am believing they are real, mind you--cause a noticeable effect in the air? I still think that because we didn't see any noticeable change in winds where I live due to it, the big earthquake/tsunami in the Indian Ocean must not have really moved the earth. > > There, I thought too much about it. > > Good luck. > > Gary > GaryLShelton@xxxxxxxxxxx > >