[geocentrism] Re: Falsifying the Geosynchronous Satellite Concept
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 07:18:25 +1000
Bernie after 15 minutes reading and delving into the links, this whole article
below falls on one statement, which is a very weak (untenable) argument.
And this is that the tides and all those effects are supernatural events for
the purpose of man.
If God intervenes with His power in this way, then we might as well scrap
science altogether. Whats the point of looking for a electromagnetic effect, if
it is already declared as a supernatural force?
One thing is certain and that is that God would not resort to deception,
We now know that tidal effects of orbiting satellites do result on other
planets, which supports the theory of the moons gravitational effect on the
sea. We even know by measurement that planetary alignments of the solar system
effect the earth, and not just the sea, but the magma as well.
Why would God supernaturally hold tidal effects on other planetary bodies,
which are only recently (relatively) confirmed, just to confuse man when he
discovers these effects, in support of a supernatural reason for tides being
there to guide us in crop production?
Gravity is not supernatural.
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Bernard Brauer
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 3:08 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Falsifying the Geosynchronous Satellite Concept
http://www.fixedearth.com/geosynchronous_sa.htm
Falsifying the Geosynchronous Satellite Concept
Inserting words such as "anti-gravity, electromagnetism, Van
Allen Belt, magnetosphere, geosynchronous satellites, etc., into a search
engine will lead one into about a year and a half of reading material.
Mercifully, the conclusions vary but little from those in the five chapters
relating to the geosynchronous satellite controversy I put in The Earth Is Not
Moving several years ago (pp.239-264).
The question of whether certain specific satellites orbit the
Earth synchronously--as they would have to be doing if the Earth is
rotating--or if they are actually stationary over a non-moving Earth as they
are observed to be at all times, needs to be answered. Indeed, since
challenges to the Copernican Rotating Earth Model are being brought more and
more into the open, that need is very real.
We can start here: Which force would be stronger when acting on
the two mutually exclusive Satellite Models.? Is Gravity stronger or is
Electromagnetism?
As physicist Wal Thornhill (et al) agree: "Electromagnetic forces are
infinitely more powerful than gravity." (HERE, p. 4). As we know, a child can
test this statement with a plain magnet or an electromagnet and a coin on the
ground. Gravity holds the coin on the ground, but pass the magnet over it at
some appropriate height and..
When the mysteries and the facts are brought together to try to
explain why there is a precise slot in the sky at 22,236 miles altitude where
these satellites appear to be stationary overhead at all times (unless moved a
little by ground control in an east or west direction), the resolution
invariably comes down to the more fundamental question of whether the earth is
rotating or not.
Since that question has long been considered settled-and
especially since Einstein's relativity rescued Copernicanism from 20 years of
deep trouble it was in-little thought if any is given to whether these
satellites rotate geosynchronously with a rotating earth below. There they are
right in the same spot any time you look. That is an observable fact. And we
all know, don't we, that the earth rotates; so, there can be only one
conclusion, namely, the satellite revolves with it, right?
Wrong! The only fact in that concept is that the satellite is always
overhead. We know this is a fact-a scientific truth--because we can see it.
The rotating earth concept, however, is based entirely on
assumptions which not only have never been observed by anyone who has ever
lived, but which flatly contradict that which has always been observed by
everyone who has ever lived. (Go HERE for a list of seven assumptions which are
upholding a rotating, orbiting earth.and HERE for photographic evidence we can
all see that tell us that the earth is stationary with everything going around
every day.unless, again, we assume what we can't see and do not know, i.e., a
rotating earth.and then call that assumption "science".)
These and other factors tend to level the playing field somewhat
for any who would simply dismiss any concept of a stationary satellite hovering
over a stationary earth. Add these other three quick arguments in support of a
stationary earth (and hence a stationary satellite) and that playing field will
do more than become level, and, will in fact tilt sharply against both a
rotating earth and geosynchronous satellites:
1) For those who do not dismiss Biblical teachings outright, but are open to
giving those teachings various degrees of credibility, it should be noted that
the Bible plainly and repeatedly teaches that it is the sun that moves and not
the earth (HERE - HERE). Hundreds of millions of people who are a lot smarter
than evolutionists think, stand ready to welcome evidence which confirms the
Bible.
2) Recently revealed hard facts declare that the rotating, orbiting earth
theory is an indispensable component of the entire Big Bang Paradigm of 15
billion years of evolutionism. Also revealed is the fact that this
evolution-based "creation scenario" was written by Rabbinic "sages" over many
centuries in the Kabbala, an occult "holy book" of the Pharisee Religion (HERE
- HERE - HERE). Who is ready to declare this "holy book" the correct one and
align themselves with the Christ-hating Pharisee religion on the creation
issue?? This subject goes to the heart of all beliefs, namely: Belief in
Billions of years of evolution-with or without g'd and promoted by an
anti-Christ Religion disguised as "secular science". OR belief in six days of
creation by a God with an eternal plan and resources to carry out the plan.
3) Equally hard facts confirm (HERE - HERE - HERE - HERE) the incredible
level of high tech fraud involved in computerized manipulation of mirrors in
telescopes, funny cameras, phony use of parallax and two dozen other deceptive
star distance measuring techniques, virtual reality lies, misleading simulation
and imaging techniques, etc. It's all been concocted by a Theoretical Science
Establishment geared to upholding and furthering the implementation of today's
Kabbalic Cosmos. In this Cosmos the Copernican Model of a rotating, orbiting
earth is the Keystone that must be protected against all challenges. including
very prominently this issue: Are those satellites geosynchronous or truly
stationary?
Now, About Electromagnetism, etc, and Geostationary Satellites..
As mentioned, both the moving and non-moving satellite models
stay overhead at the precise altitude of 22,236 miles. They basically do not
stray up or down or east or west.
One thing is certain regarding both models: Some force or
combination of forces which no one really understands is keeping those
particular satellites-unlike thousands of others-overhead at all times.
From Newton till today the standard mathematics which attempt to
explain all space phenomena centers on the concept of "gravity". The apple
and all else falls to the ground and this observed fact needs a name. Call it
"gravity". No problem.
But to attribute the formation of the earth and all else in the
universe to gravitational forces pulling and shaping and rotating and orbiting
Big Bang debris into its present mind-blowing order and function and precision
is more than a bit off the wall when you think about it, isn't it? Take one
quick example, viz., the matter of tides on the earth. Here we are told that
the scientific explanation is that the Moon's weak gravity stretches the earth
like a rubber ball and thus controls tides on both sides of the earth. This
utterly sappy, contra-scientific nonsense has become a scientific "fact" that
is in all the books (HERE). How can we have been brought to believe such
pseudo-scientific balderdash?!
Well, Kabbalic "science" ("falsely so called": I Tim. 6:20,21)
rules over the world's "knowledge" today (HERE), that's how. This "knowledge"
must have a non-Biblical, naturalistic "explanation" for the tidal phenomena;
so "gravity" got the job.
It's the same with the geosynchronous satellite concept.
"Gravity" gets the job of explaining how this could work. I submit to you that
this explanation-even when coupled with centrifugal force is fundamentally
incapable of sustaining this concept. There is, however, another explanation
for what is going on.
But first, the alleged gravity-enabled geosynchronous model:
Consider what is required to make this particular satellite geosynchronous
after it is placed in this unique slot in space where it remains day in and day
out for decades:
a) It must attain and maintain an exact speed of 6865 MPH throughout those
decades. To be off by even 1 MPH would throw it out of pocket by over 700 miles
in one month. Off 10 MPH = 7000 miles out of position in one month. This is a
serious problem. No other satellites retain an unassisted, unvarying speed;
why should this one??
b) It must perform a perfectly circular orbit with absolutely no apogee or
perigee. This is something no other satellite has done.
c) It must stay confined top and bottom and on both sides within this small
invisible circular space tunnel at all times. Breaking out of this 4-way
confinement in any direction would of necessity affect the required speed and
direction and hence bollix everything up.including the location where your
satellite dish points.
d) The ring of geostationary satellites now over the equator has very nearly
the maximum permitted number of vacancies filled, i.e., 180 at 2 degrees apart.
Because of this limited capacity, the rush is on to get "virtual geostationary
satellites" with orbital apogees of 13-16000 miles along certain latitudes no
closer than 15 degrees N and S (so as not to interfere with the geostationary
ring). These are needed in order to overcome the 2 degree limitation and to
augment the amount of information traffic that can be handled through the
geostationary satellites.
This technologically exciting operation employs multiple
satellites in highly eccentric orbits which are arrayed so that they only
power-on when in their apogee arc that is closest to the geostats.. One of the
characteristics of the orbits of this new "virtual geostationary satellite"
invention actually contains proof that the geosynchronous concept is wrong!
What characteristic?! This: Their orbits can be clockwise OR
counterclockwise. while all geostat orbits must be counterclockwise to match
the alleged counterclockwise rotation of the earth.
How does that prove the geosynchronous concept is wrong?
It is noted that these "virtual geostat" constellations can make
2 and 3 and 4 orbits a day, and we find, for example, in the three-orbit-a-day
model that ".each of the satellites [in the array] is enabled [turned on] near
its apogee for a duration of four hours, which is 50% of its total orbit
period". (http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6701126-description.html p.6 of 24)
It is further noted that this capability causes these ".satellites to appear
to 'hang' in the sky because their angular velocity at or near apogee
approximates the rotation rate of the earth" [at a given latitude]. (Ibid. p.5)
The point here is that this almost stationary, observable
"hanging" satellite over a limited area would not be possible for those
"virtual geostats" which are traveling in a clockwise orbit if the earth is
rotating. This is obvious because the same observable "hanging" effect could
not be produced by "virtual geostats" going in opposite directions over a
rotating earth any more than the alleged counterclockwise moving geosynchronous
satellites could produce the effect of "hanging" stationary if they were to
turn around and go in a clockwise orbit. (Is a stentorian Eureka! in order
here?!) (This may also disprove the goofy but necessary assumption that the
earth's atmosphere turns with its alleged rotation, adjusting its speed with
every inch from the equator to the poles.and unaffected by an alleged orbital
speed of 67,000 MPH.)
e) The geostationary satellites have little propulsion jets on them for use
now and then to get them back in place when they have moved a little bit. In
the old days when one satellite conked out, they would move a good one in the
direction of the bad one just far enough so that the traffic from both
directions could still be handled. These were re-positionings within the
circular geostationary ring that were done to maintain coverage and not to
correct a problem within the ring itself. One such case involved a good
satellite that was moved 675 miles. Neither it nor the bad one had gotten out
of their assigned slots in the ring at 22.236 miles altitude. Both were
observable overhead right where they were supposed to be at all times.
But note this: The good satellite was moved ".674.42 statute
miles westward!-from 97.45 to 107.2 degrees W Longitude--over a period of 42
days at the precise speed of 16.06 MPDay.". This maneuver was carried out based
on "fixed earth" calculations according to a letter from the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration. (Details and reproduction of this letter: HERE
in the 5th of five chapters on these satellites.)
Given the fact that this successful maneuver was predicated on a
fixed earth without mentioning whether the satellite was also fixed in the
calculations or whether it continued orbiting eastwardly at 6865 MPH, let us
try that option and see what happens: Option #1: The earth is stopped from its
alleged rotation and the good satellite and the bad one and all others continue
their alleged eastwardly orbits. The propulsion jets slow the speed of the
good satellite 16.06 MPDay for 42 days and when the good satellite has lost 675
miles in the 42 day slowdown it is now 675 miles closer to the bad satellite to
its west and can handle its responsibilities. Perfect. The deed is done.
But wait.. There is no real model wherein the earth is fixed and
the satellite orbits a stationary earth!! So, obviously, this option could not
produce the required maneuver, and is ruled out. That leaves only Option #2:
Again, the earth is stopped from its alleged rotation and is "fixed". Along
with the others in the ring, the good satellite is stopped in its alleged orbit
and also becomes "fixed". The propulsion jets move the now inert good
satellite westward (as was actually done) at 16.06 MPDay for 42 days and it
ends up 675 miles closer to the bad satellite than it was before, and the
operation is complete. Perfect. The deed is done.
But wait again! This is a geocentric model!! It works and the
other one doesn't! The official admission that "a fixed earth" is required for
a successful maneuver is true; but the satellite (and all the others in the
ring) must also be fixed for it to work. (Again:Details HERE, pp.260-264.)
f) Getting to the "gravity" part, we find that this weak and overworked
concept is given the acid test when called upon to explain how a so-called
geosynchronous satellite could do what it has to do. Think it through: Fact:
There is an invisible circular ring with a circumference of some 165,000 miles
around the earth which can "contain" as many as 180 satellites, all of which
are at an altitude of 22.236 miles, and all of which can be observationally
confirmed to be in the same place all the time.
Based on the fact that other satellites orbit the earth, it is
natural-without thinking of the complications of making these geosynchronous
--to jump to the conclusion that the stationary one overhead is also orbiting.
Add to that knee-jerk reaction, the rule Physicists use which declares that
there can be no inertia in the universe (HERE, p.9) and one can see why people
just accept the conclusion that the satellite is orbiting geosynchronously and
consider the matter closed.
As already seen, what is not natural is to dogmatically insist
that geosynchronous movement of the satellite is the only possible conclusion.
The reason this conclusion is not truly natural is because there is not now nor
has there ever been any proof that the earth is rotating on an axis. If it
isn't and we believe it isn't after seeing the evidence, the only truly natural
question that would come to mind is: What is keeping that thing up there?! But
after centuries of indoctrination into the heliocentricity concept from
Copernicus through Kepler, Galileo, Newton, Einstein, Sagan, etc., it has
become "natural" to "know" the earth rotates and hence the satellite must be
orbiting geosynchronously and that is what keeps it up there.
Five things are certain at this point: 1) The ultimate reason for
insisting that these satellites are in geosynchronous orbit is based on the
unproven and wholly vulnerable assumption that the earth is rotating; 2) This
geosynchronous dogma is absolutely and totally sacrosanct to the entire
theoretical science establishment now in control of the world's "knowledge"
(HERE); 3) If these satellites are not geosynchronous, then the earth is not
rotating as the whole world has been led to believe; 4) That conclusion alone
will cause the entire false science Idol to implode; 5) The Pharisee Religion's
Big Bang Paradigm of 15 Billion years of evolutionism (HERE)-and all the false
science built on the Kabbala's model of the Origin of the universe (HERE)-will
do the Humpty-Dumpty number.expressed in Biblical terms as The Fall of Babylon
(Rev. 14:8; 17:14; 18: 2, 4,10; etc.).
So don't be surprised when the hounds of hell are unleashed to
prevent any serious threat to the rotating earth model, whether on this point
about satellites or any other. It is a spiritual battle at bottom and it will
be settled "one hour" after the GGG (Global Government Gangsters) get their
briefcases open (Rev. 17:12, 14)
***
But there needs to be something besides the weak "gravity"
concept to cause those truly stationary geostationary satellites to just "hang"
up there even in the Non-moving Earth Model. But what?!
Well, one is reminded that the Bible says that God "hung the
Earth on nothing" (Job 26:7). A simulation of such a non-moving Earth can be
seen (www.fixedearth.com) . The question under the picture asks: "Could God
not have engineered something like this?? That is to say, since a $50
Levitating Globe Novelty can demonstrate clearly and simply that something
gravity would normally pull downward is caused to hang in space by an unseen
force, we need to know if such a proven force is available. We are told and we
know that such a force is available. It is called electromagnetism.
Thus, while we take into consideration that an apparently equal
gravitational force of some 14.7 lbs psi covers the surface of the Earth, we
also know this is not the kind of force that could play a significant role in
causing a geostationary satellite to hang motionless in space at an altitude of
22,236 miles. We don't need any occult/ Kabbalist mathematics to confirm this.
We just know it!
We do not have to search very far for the only force known to man
that could cause the satellite to "hang" there motionless just as well over a
hundred of them are doing as we speak. Would not electromagnetic forces in
perfect balance top and bottom throughout that 165,000 miles of invisible
"tubing" allow the satellites to be popped into a slot anywhere along the tube
and hang there essentially motionless?? Considering the miraculous design
inherent in everything that exists-including gravity and electromagnetism and
other things we half-way understand but could not have created-it seems that
anyone who is open even to the most likely naturalist explanation--let alone a
Biblical one--would say: "Yeah, a balance of electromagnetic forces could hang
those satellites up there like that.just like the Levitating Globe.."
One other thing that needs to be underscored here is that.if the
scientists who know about the role electromagnetism plays in the universe were
able to get their findings published and aired in the other media, we would
soon learn some reasonable explanations for a lot of the phenomena that is now
subject only to interpretations that fit the Big Bang Paradigm from the
Kabbala.
For example, those scientists say things like: "There was no Big
Bang." & "The visible universe is much smaller than we thought.. We have no
idea of the extent of the universe." & "We have direct evidence of stellar
evolution but in a time scale comparable with the human life time" & "We don't
know the age of stars since the thermonuclear evolution theory does not apply
to them.." & "We have no idea of the age.of the universe".. & "Time travel is
impossible.." & "Space has no extra dimensions in which to warp or where
parallel universes may exist.." & "There are no neutron stars or Black Holes.."
& "Gravity is an exhausted and bankrupt concept.." Etcetera. Read these in
context and much more in this 5 page link: "The Electric Universe" (HERE)
So it is then, that when one puts the known facts on the table
about the reality of well over a hundred high-tech satellites hanging in space
around the equatorial region of the Earth at 22,236 miles altitude, it does not
take long to see that this exquisite phenomenon holds the key to discovering
the near-perfect flaw that must exist in the counterfeit Copernican Model.
That Model is the Keystone that is holding up the Bible-destroying and
Christ-destroying Kabbala-based occult physics of the Pharisee Religion (HERE).
That Religion has perverted and virtually conquered modern man's ability to
know Truth by virtue of its long career masquerading as secular theoretical
science.
The days of that masquerade's success are rapidly running out..
*******
A note on GPS Satellites:
"The GPS satellites are not in geo-stationary orbit, but instead orbit twice
every time the earth orbits once.
This means that for any observer the satellites appear to orbit once overhead
each day."
(From: GPS Satellites: Wolfram Research)
Fact: #1 - We see and know they orbit overhead once a day.
Fact #2 - One orbit a day will produce Fact #1
Fact #3 - Two orbits are...and must be assumed because...
Fact #4 - The earth's rotation is assumed.
Fact #5 - Unproven assumptions that are required to explain phenomena that
are readily explained without the assumptions constitute false science.
Fact #6 - One orbit a day around a stationary earth produces all the known
behavior of GPS Satellites.
Fact #7 - Sans contra-scientific assumptions, GPS Satellite behavior proves a
non-rotating earth.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't get soaked. Take a quick peek at the forecast
with theYahoo! Search weather shortcut.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.20/736 - Release Date: 27/03/2007
4:38 PM
Other related posts:
