[geocentrism] Assumptions, assumptions
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Mike" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:55:20 -0000
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 11:12 PM
Subject: Re: [geocentrism] Re: NASA and the Moon
Indeed one of its assumptions is that there is
> no such thing as a truely stationary coordinate system privalaged above
> any other (acentrism). All evidence that supports GR therefore supports
> it acentric assumption.
Here we go Mike! It's assumption time. Without this assumption what do we
have? If there is evidence to support it why is it still called an
assumption?
Jack
Other related posts:
- » [geocentrism] Assumptions, assumptions
