Let me get this straight - I write an ID and some other piece of frivilous info on my $2 'coin' and use snail-mail to send the coin to www.geogamer.com. It not only counts as an official find at the web site, but I earn enough points after a year of caching to order a toaster. I don't have to write in the logbook. I don't have to write an e-log. Because I and others pay for find-verification, it is less likely that others will cheat with their find counts. My find count will be special because I paid for verification. If I've found 100 caches registered with www.geocaching.com, do the placers have to register those 100 on www.geogamer.com for me to claim them there? Do I have to find them again to get the new ID to have them officially found? Ok. I'm done talking about the new site for a long, long time. (but I will be lurking!) Glenn wrote: > My take is that you don?t *put* the coins in the caches. You put the > cache ID and the direction point S,N E W ect in the cache on a sticker > or a piece of paper, this info is recorded on a coin that you take out > of you pocket and send back to the site as a verification that you > actually been to the site. (the special code words) > > Still, ya cant put the code words on a virtual cache to record for the > log. Ya cant even log the cache without knowing the # and direction > point. > > Glenn > > -----Original Message----- > From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Paul Konopacki > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 8:58 PM > To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [GeoSTL] Re: www.geogamer.com > > One hole in the concept is that they won't be > able to place their coins at virtual > and locationless and benchmark caches. > That's a growing chunk of the cache population. > > And putting their coins in a cache on the > top of Mt. Everest isn't going to generate > them much money. My fear is that the > marketing scheme to circulate their coins > is going to produce caches that are easy to > find and very close to each other. The > romance of exploration and becoming one > with nature takes a backseat to free > enterprise. > > JimSGreene@xxxxxxx wrote: > > K.I.S.S. (Keep It Simple Stupid) >