[GeoSTL] Re: NO FINDS
- From: Glenn <GLNash@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 19:59:37 -0500
I don?t know. I really didn?t think anybody would just archive them, Poof,
just like that. Jeremy must be having a slow caching day at the office. The
Mississippi cache was reported as a no find twice before me going back as
far as March 31st with NO comment from the cache owner. That may have played
a factor but at GWP I think mine was only the 2ond confirmed NO FIND here.
I guess J. has this log tag filtered to get right to him and he isn?t
messing around with tons of ?no find ? logs on a cache anymore. I shall be
more careful on using that log tag again.
Glenn
Going out to *not find* some RGS caches :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of GC-RGS
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:45 PM
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [GeoSTL] Re: NO FINDS
Glenn, You've sure got the power!
Now we need to figure out how to put it to good use!
I wonder what would happen if you logged it as a find and marked it as
"should be archived"?
----- Original Message -----
From: Glenn <mailto:GLNash@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:28 PM
Subject: [GeoSTL] Re: NO FINDS
Oops, I didn?t mean for them to get archived, just have somebody go look at
them. I really think the caches are very gone tho.. I didn?t think anybody
at chancing central was looking at these logs. Yeeks. I better be careful
what I mark with a ?should be archived? tag. I just thought that was more of
a ?in my opinion? sort of comment tag.
Glenn
Other related posts:
