[GeoSTL] Re: NO FINDS
- From: RGS <gc-rgs@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 20:24:55 -0500
I just noticed Konopapw has had a profitable day, even some letterboxes at the
zoo. I guess I'll go to Thorny bush tomorrow since the weather's so nice.
----- Original Message -----
From: Glenn
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:59 PM
Subject: [GeoSTL] Re: NO FINDS
I don't know. I really didn't think anybody would just archive them, Poof,
just like that. Jeremy must be having a slow caching day at the office. The
Mississippi cache was reported as a no find twice before me going back as far
as March 31st with NO comment from the cache owner. That may have played a
factor but at GWP I think mine was only the 2ond confirmed NO FIND here.
I guess J. has this log tag filtered to get right to him and he isn't messing
around with tons of "no find " logs on a cache anymore. I shall be more careful
on using that log tag again.
Glenn
Going out to *not find* some RGS caches J
-----Original Message-----
From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of GC-RGS
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:45 PM
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [GeoSTL] Re: NO FINDS
Glenn, You've sure got the power!
Now we need to figure out how to put it to good use!
I wonder what would happen if you logged it as a find and marked it as
"should be archived"?
----- Original Message -----
From: Glenn
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:28 PM
Subject: [GeoSTL] Re: NO FINDS
Oops, I didn't mean for them to get archived, just have somebody go look at
them. I really think the caches are very gone tho.. I didn't think anybody at
chancing central was looking at these logs. Yeeks. I better be careful what I
mark with a "should be archived" tag. I just thought that was more of a "in my
opinion" sort of comment tag.
Glenn
Other related posts:
