- Yea, you are probably right. After I posted it, I thought about that issue and wondered if I should have. But it was in the excitement of the movement of getting my story in the New York Times (I was posting the story in lots of places). And I was not posting it for political reasons, I thought some may be interested in my story and the fact it made the NYT. You have to admit, it is a rather well written story. So if I crossed the line, I apologize. I was NOT doing it to start a discussion on the spying, just wanted to share my story. Jim Bensman "Nature Bats Last" > -----Original Message----- > From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:geocaching- > bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of LuAnn > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 9:46 PM > To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [GeoStL] Re: NCR: I made the New York Times today: A Man, a Plan, > a Dam. Then, an F.B.I. Call. - New York Times > > - > I agree with Eric. Let's not let this get out of hand like another time. > I don't discuss my political/religious views here, let's keep it that > way all around. > LuAnn > Eric East <christianherper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > - > I have been banned for posting my religous and political views on the > list. > I had to promise to keep my views on these subjects off of the free list > in > order to be allowed to post, so I believe it's only right to ask you to > keep your political agenda off of this list as well. > > Eric > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jim Bensman" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 12:57 AM > Subject: [GeoStL] NCR: I made the New York Times today: A Man, a Plan, a > Dam. Then, an F.B.I. Call. - New York Times > > > > - > > There is something in the Post Dispatch today too, have not seen it yet. > > > > > > The reporter did not get everything right, but I like the story. And it > > is > > not everyday you get in the NY Times (only the 4th time for me). > > > > > > > > It certainly gives new context to Bush's claim that they are only spying > > without warrants on "suspected terrorist" when you can get labeled as a > > suspected terrorist this easy for exercising your 1st amendment rights. > > > > > > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/22/us/22dam.html?ex=1156910400 > > > 65c233&ei=5070&emc=eta1> &en=fb1037510b65c233&ei=5070&emc=eta1 > > > > > > > > August 22, 2006 > > > > > > > > A Man, a Plan, a Dam. Then, an F.B.I. Call. > > > > > > > > By CORNELIA DEAN > > > > > > > > On July 25, Jim Bensman of Alton, Ill., attended a public meeting on the > > proposed construction of a bypass channel for fish at a dam on the > > Mississippi River. Less than a week later, he was under investigation by > > the > > F.B.I. - the victim, depending on how you look at it, of either a comedy > > of > > errors or alarming antiterror zeal. > > > > > > > > The meeting was organized by the Army Corps of Engineers, which > maintains > > Mississippi River navigation systems, including the Melvin Price Lock > and > > Dam in East Alton, Ill., where it is considering construction of a fish > > passage. > > > > > > > > At the meeting, Mr. Bensman, a coordinator with Heartwood, an > > environmental > > organization, suggested the corps simply destroy the dam. It was an idea > > the > > corps itself had considered. In fact, a photograph of an exploding dam > was > > included in the corps' PowerPoint presentation, explosive demolition > being > > by far the most common method of dam removal. > > > > > > > > Mr. Bensman said he had long criticized the system of locks and dams as > > environmentally damaging and an unfair government subsidy benefiting > boat > > traffic over railroads. "I've been fighting these things for decades," > he > > said. > > > > > > > > But news accounts of the hearing did not put it quite like that. One > > newspaper said simply that he "would like to see the dam blown up." > > > > > > > > And on July 31, he said, he got a telephone call from someone who > > identified > > himself as Matt Federhofer, an agent of the Federal Bureau of > > Investigation. > > There is such a person at the agency's office in Fairview Heights, Ill., > a > > St. Louis suburb, but he did not respond to a voicemail message > yesterday. > > . > > > > > > > > > > When Mr. Bensman learned what the call was about "it was just kind of > > disbelief," he said. "How could anyone be so utterly stupid as to think > > that > > was a terrorist threat?" For one thing, he said, it would be ridiculous > > for > > a would-be terrorist to announce explosive intentions at a public > meeting, > > much less a meeting sponsored by an arm of the military. > > > > > > > > But when the agent said he wanted to visit him at home, Mr. Bensman > became > > frightened. "I was thinking, I need to talk to an attorney," Mr. Bensman > > recalled. "And he said, 'Well, O.K., I will put you down as not > > cooperating.' " > > > > > > > > That was when Mr. Bensman got angry. "I know what Bush is doing with all > > these secret programs spying on the so-called terrorists, all these > > provisions in the Patriot Act that I think crosses the line, being able > to > > spy on a suspected terrorist without the check and balance of a court or > a > > judge," he said. "That's just something that really worries you." > > > > > > > > He said he also remembered that the F.B.I. had a history of spying on > > civil > > rights, antiwar and environmental activists. He said one reason he knew > > his > > caller was a genuine agent was that he could cite items in Mr. Bensman's > > own > > F.B.I. file. > > > > > > > > Mr. Bensman said the agent had told him that someone from the corps had > > asked the F.B.I. to investigate him. "I was saying, 'What in the world?' > > There is no way anyone in the corps could reasonably think I was a > > terrorist > > threat. They know me." > > > > > > > > Kevin Bluhm, the corps official who moderated the meeting, said he > doubted > > the call came from the corps. Though he conceded that Mr. Bensman has > long > > been a thorn in its collective side, "he's not malicious, oh no," Mr. > > Bluhm > > said. "This was just Jim. He comes to a lot of our meetings, and he is > > anti > > a lot of the stuff that we do." > > > > > > > > Mr. Bluhm, who leads the corps' public communication efforts along the > > Mississippi, said he could understand why the F.B.I. felt obliged to > check > > Mr. Bensman out, but "if they would have asked me first, I would have > said > > no, there's not that kind of risk there." > > > > > > > > Marshall Stone, a spokesman for the Springfield, Ill., office of the > > F.B.I., > > said, "A lot of things we look into turn out to be things we don't have > to > > be concerned about." > > > > > > > > Mr. Bensman, who wrote an account of his experience which is circulating > > on > > the Internet, said he had been informed that he is not now suspected of > > anything. But he worries that his phone may be tapped and wonders what > > will > > happen if he is pulled over for a traffic violation: "Are the cops going > > to > > think I am a terrorist? You never know what is going to happen > nowadays." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > **************************************** > > For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from > this > > list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching > > Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw > > > > > > **************************************** > For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this > list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching > Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw > > > > > > **************************************** > For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this > list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching > Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw **************************************** For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw