[GeoStL] Re: [ARCHIVE] Re: Followup: Re: Bad Karma GCCB93 & Blue Monkey GCCB92

  • From: Glenn <Glenn@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 22:52:47 -0500

-
Which proves what?? It only appears to be buried. If it is gone it will be archived IS what I wrote.


I did not say that I knew that the cache was illegal as you claim.

No digging was involved with the placing of this cache. It was not illegally placed.


At 10:30 PM 5/8/2005, you wrote:

-

On Sun, 8 May 2005, Glenn wrote:

> At 09:56 PM 5/8/2005, J.A. Terranson wrote:
> >he even admitted to that knowledge earlier today.
>
>
> Really? I didnt get home until this evening and I havent spoken to
> anyone.  Gosh, I really said that these caches were illegally
> placed..... checking my email and phone logs.. No, I cant say that
> its the case.  These caches were not placed illegally.  You only assume so.

Message-Id: <6.2.3.0.0.20050508190532.02553550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.0
Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 19:07:39 -0500
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Glenn <Glenn@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Followup:  Re: Bad Karma GCCB93 & Blue Monkey
  GCCB92
In-Reply-To: <427D72C9.7010304@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <006601c55270$eefcd910$6501a8c0@rgsxppro>
 <002701c55346$89de23a0$0100a8c0@CPQ14837126272>
 <20050507194137.S95260@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
 <20050507204953.A95260@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
 <427D72C9.7010304@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed;
x-avg-checked=avg-ok-6334759
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net
X-archive-position: 19464
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Errors-To: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-original-sender: Glenn@xxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: normal
Reply-To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-list: geocaching
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net

-
It only appears to have been buried.  If this one is  is gone, it
will be archived.

glenn
At 09:00 PM 5/7/2005, Bernie wrote:

>- Personally I could never understand why both of these caches are
>allowed. They are both buried in the ground and are very very hard
>to find. Bernie.
****************************************
Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com
Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
Mail List FAQ's: //www.freelists.org/help/questions.html
****************************************
To unsubscribe from this list:
send an email to geocaching-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

---------------- Glenn, Missouri Geocachers Assoc http://www.MoGeo.com *THE* Forums for Mo & Ks. http://mogeo.ipbhost.com/index.php?

Dave's Handy Hiding Hints http://www.ratisher.com/geocache_hiding.htm
 MOGA 2005 Winners ...  Check it out!  http://moga.geostl.com

****************************************
Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
Mail List FAQ's: //www.freelists.org/help/questions.html ****************************************
To unsubscribe from this list:
send an email to geocaching-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field





Other related posts: