[frgeek-michiana] VL-Hot and HAL

  • From: Tony Germano <tony_germano@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <frgeek-michiana@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:18:16 -0500

http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/02/vl-hot-a-non-polling-alternati.html
 
 
I ran across this article that does a good job of explaining the differences 
between VL-Hot and HAL (used for autodetection of removable devices.) It also 
very clearly states that a limitation of VL-Hot is that it can not automount an 
inserted CD like HAL can. I know this was a problem we ran into at the 
warehouse. The author states that the extra polling that HAL does in order to 
be able to automount a CD creates a noticable burden on the system. I have my 
doubts that even on the older P3s we're using this would be noticable. 
Regardless, I think the minimal cpu hit from HAL is worth not having to train 
users how to mount a CD before they can open it.
 
Tony                                      
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469226/direct/01/** This list is PUBLICLY 
archived. **
PLEASE don't post personal or sensitive information unless you wish for it to 
be in the public domain.

To visit the main website for Free Geek Michiana go to 
http://www.freegeekmichiana.org

To post to the list send email to frgeek-michiana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The archive is available at //www.freelists.org/archives/frgeek-michiana/

You may unsubscribe or change your list settings by going to the list website 
at //www.freelists.org/webpage/frgeek-michiana

Other related posts: